Seanad debates
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
Business of Seanad
2:30 pm
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have received a request signed by 30 Senators to summon a meeting of the Seanad for the specific purpose of discussing a motion on the programme for Government and the Mental Health (Involuntary Procedures) (Amendment) Bill 2008. The request complied with Standing Orders and I accordingly summoned this meeting.
In accordance with the procedures which have brought the House here today there are only two items of business before the House — the motion and the Bill on the Order Paper. There is, therefore, no Order of Business.
To assist in the orderly conduct of business, I ask the Leader to propose the speaking times on the motion and the time it is intended to take the Bill.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I understand completely the technical reasons there is no Order of Business today because the business has already been ordered and, naturally, I must accept this. However, I regret the fact that we do not have an Order of Business and I think most of my colleagues will also regret this fact.
I attempted to submit an important matter for the Adjournment of the House and there does not seem to me to be any necessity to curtail the wish of Members to have matters discussed on the Adjournment because we will certainly have to adjourn Seanad Éireann and I wonder why this view has been taken officially.
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I am acting in accordance with precedents set.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Will the Cathaoirleach quote the precedents for me, either perhaps now or in writing?
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Senator Norris, I have ruled on that and I speak with that ruling.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I do not believe there is a precedent.
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have been communicating with the Cathaoirleach since 9 March. I would like to make a personal explanation to the House. I believe it is within the Cathaoirleach's remit——
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have replied to the Senator's letter and he should have received it by post today.
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I believe it is within the Cathaoirleach's remit. If he cannot accommodate me today, perhaps he can do so another day when the House is sitting.
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I cannot accommodate the Senator. I do not order the business for this House as to when it will sit again.
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
——that if my colleagues give permission for me to make a personal explanation the Cathaoirleach will accommodate that request?
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I am not in a position to say. I cannot order the business of the House and nor do I order it.
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
But if my colleagues agree to it, will you accommodate it?
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
When I ask the Cathaoirleach a question I do not ask the Clerk a question.
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have replied to the Senator and I have replied in writing on a number of occasions over the past few days.
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have been writing to the Cathaoirleach since 9 March and he has not been communicating with me.
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have replied promptly on all occasions. I call the Leader.
Ivor Callely (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
That is not so. I asked the Cathaoirleach a question.
David Norris (Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I ask the Cathaoirleach to remind the House of the long-standing tradition that the staff of this House who are held in great respect are not abused by Members. It is beyond the capacity of this House and it is completely wrong to do so.
Donie Cassidy (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
It is proposed that the motion shall be taken immediately and conclude not later than 5 p.m., if not previously concluded. Spokespersons shall speak for ten minutes with all other Senators to speak for seven minutes and Senators may share time, by agreement of the House and the Minister to be called upon to reply and take questions from spokespersons and leaders ten minutes before the conclusion. It is also proposed that No. 2, the Mental Health (Involuntary Procedures) (Amendment) Bill 2008, Committee Stage, shall conclude at 6.30 p.m. It shall be adjourned or conclude, whichever the House wishes at that stage.
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
What are the arrangements for speaking times on the Bill?
Maurice Cummins (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Was there some question of a motion coming before the House regarding a justice matter that had to be proposed or will this be dealt with at a later stage?
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have not received any notice as yet.
Donie Cassidy (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
On a point of information, in order to support Senator Cummins, can a supplementary Order Paper be issued later today?
Pat Moylan (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
No. I am not taking anything else. I have outlined what the Order of Business is for today.