Seanad debates

Wednesday, 13 November 2002

Adjournment Matters. - Satellite Space Allocation.

 

Photo of Terry LeydenTerry Leyden (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I welcome the Minister of State to the House. The question of the utilisation of satellite space allocated to Ireland under international agreement arose during my tenure as spokesperson for Communications. I raised with the Minister at that time, the former Deputy Jim Mitchell, the question of the allocation of Ireland's satellite location to a company called Atlantic Satellites, which was a link between the Hughes Corporation in the United States and Mr. James Stafford, who is well known in the context of the Flood tribunal.

Deputy Mitchell agreed to give this tremendous opportunity to a company with no investment or previous experience and thereby excluded RTÉ and then Telecom Éireann, now Eircom. I raised the issue because I believed a golden opportunity was thrown away by the Minister. His reasons for granting such a valuable asset to a company with a £1 shareholding have never been explained to me. I questioned his decision at the time and now I question it again.

I ask the Minister of State to outline what has happened since that decision was made. Promises have been made and broken. Between 50 and 60 jobs were promised for Shannon but were not delivered. RTÉ lost an opportunity to broadcast into the United Kingdom and parts of Europe, ahead of Sky Television, from a position allocated to Ireland above the Indian Ocean. What has happened to this valuable asset?

This issue has not featured in the media for many years. A golden opportunity was lost to RTÉ. The company could have been ahead of Sky Television and many of the present operators in this field in providing satellite broadcasting. I question the decision by the former Minister and I hope the Minister of State can clarify what has transpired since then in the Department.

The latest information I have on the issue dates from 1988 when Deputy Richard Bruton put down a question to the Minister, Deputy Ray Burke. At that time the Minister had no option but to grant a one year extension to Atlantic Satellite because a commitment had been entered into by the previous Administration.

Why has this serious issue been excluded from the Flood tribunal? The decision of the Minister, former Deputy Jim Mitchell, to afford this Irish asset to Atlantic Satellites, a £1 shelf company linked to the Hughes Corporation in the US, must be questioned. A marvellous opportunity to provide satellite broadcasting to Ireland, the United Kingdom and parts of Europe – the most lucrative market at the time – was lost to the State.

I do not know what information the Minister of State has at her disposal and I will respond when I hear her reply.

Síle de Valera (Clare, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I apologise on behalf of the Minister for Communications, Deputy Dermot Ahern, who cannot be here. He has asked me to make the following statement.

I would like to thank the Senator for raising this matter. Satellite communications is but one of many uses of the radio spectrum. The radio spectrum is an important resource in the development of a modern communications infrastructure.

As the radio spectrum is a limited resource, its utilisation is managed through a licensing framework laid down in the Wireless Telegraphy Acts. Licensing is a matter that has devolved from my Department to the Director for Telecommunications Regulation under the Telecommunications (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1996. This function will pass to the new commission for communications regulation, which the Senator is no doubt aware is due to be established shortly. However, I will outline the position in relation to satellite space capacity allocated to Ireland under international agreements.

International agreements covering radio spectrum are normally developed at radio conferences organised by the International Telecommunications Union – the ITU. The decisions of these conferences are normally incorporated into a set of international regulations called the ITU Radio Regulations.

In the areas of space communications there are two different parts of the international regulations that are relevant. One part deals with the broadcasting satellite service. Broadcasting systems are typically one-way transmission systems from the satellite to the consumer. Ireland has been assigned ten transmission channels for satellite broadcasting. With digital transmissions each transmission channel has the potential to cater for between six and ten programme channels. However, there is a trade-off between the picture quality and the number of programme channels.

If a system were to be developed the actual number of programme channels in each transmission system channel would be a matter for an operator to propose and reach agreement with the regulator as part of any licensing agreement. It should also be noted that within the context of the international regulations for the broadcasting service the coverage available is normally based on that necessary to cover one's national territory. Consequently, from the ten transmission channels assigned to Ireland the coverage is primarily restricted to Ireland, although there would be some spill-over into the UK.

Another part of the international radio regulations deals with national allotments for two-way satellite transmission systems. This type of system would typically be used for the telecommunications service, including Internet access. Within this part of the international regulations Ireland has certain rights of access to satellite frequency bands and orbit segments. However, these rights are general in nature. Considerable work would have to be undertaken by a prospective operator in conjunction with the regulator to convert these general rights into operational characteristics and obtain the necessary agreements in accordance with the provisions of the international radio regulations.

Deployment of satellites is a very expensive undertaking. For it to be successful there must be suitable market conditions. Currently I am not aware of any interest to develop an Irish satellite service nor has the director indicated that interest has been expressed to her.

The Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1926, although amended over the years, is still the primary legislation covering the use of radio communications. This Act was enacted long before satellites became a reality, and while it covers the licensing of wireless telegraph apparatus on land, sea and in the air, including terminals on the ground transmitting or receiving from satellites, its adequacy in relation to satellites in space is questionable. I am at present having a review of this legislation carried out with a view to proposing new legislation.

Photo of Terry LeydenTerry Leyden (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I ask that the Flood tribunal investigate this. I have given the Department all the replies.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach:

The Senator may communicate directly with the Flood tribunal.

Photo of Terry LeydenTerry Leyden (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Minister has provided a detailed response but he has not responded to the allegation—

An Leas-Chathaoirleach:

There are other ways to raise this issue. There is no precedent for a Member responding to a Minister during the Adjournment.

Photo of Terry LeydenTerry Leyden (Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I am asking the Flood tribunal to investigate this issue.