Seanad debates

Tuesday, 4 March 2008

3:00 pm

Photo of Paul CoghlanPaul Coghlan (Fine Gael)

I agree with the remarks of Senators Alex White, Déirdre de Búrca and David Norris on the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. We have suspected fishy business, so to speak, for quite a while and a number of decisions seemed rather questionable. Senator Norris has been strong on this matter and I have agreed with him. I support today's call for a debate on the matter with the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and I hope the Deputy Leader can arrange it.

It is appropriate that the Deputy Leader is taking questions today because I have one that I know he will be able to answer fully. What is the rationale behind the recent decision, if it is a decision, on Part V of the Planning and Development Act dealing with social and affordable housing, as amended in 2002? I understood that as a result of the amendment a builder or developer could give money or land in lieu of setting aside 20% of a development for social and affordable housing or provide houses elsewhere. There has been comment on this recently. I believe it will lead to segregation, something the Deputy Leader's party opposed in the past. If a developer provides money in lieu, it takes a local authority time to find suitable land on which to spend it, hence frequent long delays in the provision of social and affordable housing.

I wrote about this matter recently and am concerned that a country as small as ours can see such unevenness in the application of the rules in various local authorities. I have great faith in the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy John Gormley, and I know he means well with respect to many issues in my home county, not least Killarney House and sea eagles. I am concerned about this issue however, and know there is no better man than Senator Boyle to explain the rationale behind what is going on and where the matter is headed.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.