John Dardis (Progressive Democrats)

—— which has the interest of the patient at its heart. It would be worthwhile for this House to debate this report which was prepared by a private Swedish organisation. I understand it is only the second report of its type, the first being a pilot report on 12 countries. My view, and that of many neutral observers, is that the report contains many inaccuracies. The figures are out of date and it does not take into account initiatives such as the National Treatment Purchase Fund. Moreover, it does not take into account the reduction in the waiting list for cardiac surgery, from several years on the last occasion on which Senator Ryan's party had anything to do with it, to several weeks at present. Hence, one must get the balance right. The only way to so do is to have a proper debate in the House. I am sure that as always, the Tánaiste will be available to speak in such a debate.

It has been repeatedly pointed out that all stakeholders, and not simply the Government, have a role to play in this regard. This point was most forcibly made in a "Prime Time" programme dealing with the matter, or during the "Questions and Answers" programme which was broadcast after it. While the Government has significant responsibilities, which it takes seriously, all stakeholders have a role.

As for the general matter of private Bills which has been raised by Senator Brian Hayes, it is common practice in this House for Members to introduce private Bills. Some succeed in their entirety while others do not. A Bill will be debated tomorrow in Private Members' time. Hence, I do not see anything particularly extraordinary or difficult about Members introducing Private Members' Bills on the floor of the House or their endeavours to get them into law. This happens all the time and is the practice of all parties. I cited one recently, namely, Senator Leyden's Registration of Wills Bill, on which he is to be commended and about which he has been extremely consistent.