Seanad debates

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

Development of Rugby: Motion.

 

2:30 pm

Photo of Kieran PhelanKieran Phelan (Fianna Fail)

This is not the first example of such excessive spending by the IRFU. It appears such a block booking is normal for the association whenever the national side plays abroad.

Another point which suggests possible discrimination against Connacht is the fact that none of the other provinces has been asked to make a presentation on cost cutting. Surely each of the other provinces would be able to tighten its belt to some extent in an effort to save the professional game in Connacht.

The IRFU estimates it will run up a loss of €7 million this year, whereas cutting the cost of the professional game in Connacht would only amount to an estimated saving of €2 million. What is the sense in this? Surely a wider view of the problem needs to be taken by the IRFU. Surely it should not cut off its nose to spite its face. I urge the Minister to bring all his influence to bear with the IRFU and, if necessary, withhold grants from the association if it is unwilling to adopt another approach to this matter.

The professional game in Connacht is essential for the good of the game, not only in the province but also throughout the country. We cannot neglect one area for the sake of taking the easy option. The IRFU needs to think of another way of handling its problems and avoid critically injuring the game in Connacht. It should be remembered that once one amputates a limb, one cannot replace it.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.