Seanad debates

Wednesday, 18 December 2002

Photo of Joe O'TooleJoe O'Toole (Independent)

I wish to raise another point which is related to this significant and serious issue. I do not suggest the Government is acting unconstitutionally or otherwise, but it is acting outside the spirit of the law and the debate in the House.

During the course of the debate on the legislation, to which Senator Brian Hayes referred, in this House and the Lower House, there was a lengthy discussion regarding the importance of directly elected mayors. That issue was seen as an enticement to encouraging more people to participate in local politics and ensuring that the office assumed a status in society. It was an extremely important discussion and there was an understanding that we would move in the direction outlined. I accept, however, that the Government is entitled to make a decision not to do so. This is an issue in which I am disinterested and which is of no concern to me personally. Directly elected mayors in other countries hold enormous attractions for society, be it as figureheads or executives. I know politicians in other parties are not enthusiastic about this matter. There are two issues involved. The establishment of the title "mayor" has given a new distinction to that office. I request a full debate on the issue.

On the point raised by Senator Hayes, I support the idea of a dual mandate. People should be allowed to elect whom they wish, when they wish and for whatever reason. I have always held that view. I know it is a shameful position.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.