Minister Shatter claims that a detailed response to the question "would require the expenditure of a disproportionate amount of staff time and resources and it is therefore not possible to provide the level of detail sought".
Is he now involved in a cover-up as he is aware that mothers who thwart Court Ordered access between fathers and their children are not sanctioned?
Minister Shatter recently said that "My personal experience prior to becoming Minister, as a lawyer dealing professionally with family law matters, was that one of the big difficulties in this area is that many fathers do not take responsibility for their children. Indeed, many of them do not seek to form and cement relationships with their children, or to involve themselves in their children's lives".
Minister Shatter is not only aware of the bias fathers face in the Secret Family Law Courts, Courts that fail to enforce their own orders, but is also quite obviously biased against fathers himself.
Cathal Garvey
Posted on 30 Sep 2011 7:52 pm
Minister Shatter claims that a detailed response to the question "would require the expenditure of a disproportionate amount of staff time and resources and it is therefore not possible to provide the level of detail sought".
Is he now involved in a cover-up as he is aware that mothers who thwart Court Ordered access between fathers and their children are not sanctioned?
Minister Shatter recently said that "My personal experience prior to becoming Minister, as a lawyer dealing professionally with family law matters, was that one of the big difficulties in this area is that many fathers do not take responsibility for their children. Indeed, many of them do not seek to form and cement relationships with their children, or to involve themselves in their children's lives".
Minister Shatter is not only aware of the bias fathers face in the Secret Family Law Courts, Courts that fail to enforce their own orders, but is also quite obviously biased against fathers himself.