Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is proposed to take No. 6, motion re referral to select committee of the proposed approval by Dáil Éireann of Ireland's accession to the memorandum of understanding concerning the principles for the establishment and operation of a battle group, and of the terms of the agreement between the Government of Ireland and the Government of the United States of America on enhancing co-operation in preventing and combating serious crime; No. 7, motion re referral to joint committee of the proposed approval by Dáil Éireann of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation; No. 13, statements on pre-European Council meeting of 30 January; and No. 14, Legal Services Regulation Bill 2011 - Second Stage (resumed).

It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that Nos. 6 and 7 shall be decided without debate; the proceedings on No. 13 shall, if not previously concluded, be brought to a conclusion after 65 minutes and the following arrangements shall apply: statements shall be made by the Taoiseach and by the main spokespersons for Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin and the Technical Group, who shall be called upon in that order, who may share their time and whose statements shall not exceed 15 minutes in each case; and a Minister or Minister of State shall be called upon to make a statement in reply which shall not exceed five minutes. Private Members' business shall be No. 38, motion re promissory notes.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There are two proposals to be put the House. Are the proposals for dealing with Nos. 6 and 7 agreed to? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 13 agreed to? Agreed.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I wish to raise an issue under Standing Order 26 to ask the Taoiseach when he will provide Government time to debate an issue of serious importance on the Order Paper, namely, the misinformation given to the House by the Minister of Education and Skills on 12 January with regard to the Water Services (Amendment) Bill. I am sure the Taoiseach will agree that to misinform the House is a serious issue and that the minute a Deputy is made aware that he or she has done this-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

We cannot debate the issue. You are quite entitled to ask for time, thank you.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

-----even if it happened inadvertently it is vital that the record be corrected and I ask the Taoiseach that this matter be dealt with expeditiously.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Taoiseach on the question of time.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

This matter can be raised during the debate on the Water Services (Amendment) Bill which is being taken tomorrow. If my recollection is clear Deputy Ó Cuív had a bit of a spat with the Minister for Education and Skills about this. As I understand it, the Minister was referring to the fact that it was necessary to enter a defence by 3 February-----

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

No.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Was that not the date?

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

He did not say that.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I suggest that rather than wasting the time of the House now Deputies deal with this when the Water Services (Amendment) Bill is before the House tomorrow.

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

No.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Sorry-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

We are not having a debate on it.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I know there cannot be debate on it but the issue I have raised-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Just resume your seat for the moment. You are quite entitled to ask for Government time. That request has been rejected by the Taoiseach therefore the only way left open to you is Private Members' time. I am moving on. We are not debating the issue. I call Deputy Adams.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I want to clarify for the Taoiseach-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

You are not telling him anything; you will resume your seat. Thank you.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

We will continue to raise this-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There are procedures in the House and we will follow them.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

-----even if it takes me five years to get this corrected on the record-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Resume your seat.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

-----because the Minister misinformed the House.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Deputy will you resume your seat please.

Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I will resume my seat and I will raise the issue every day until-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Thank you.

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Technical Group wrote to the Ceann Comhairle about this matter and I wonder why we have not received a reply.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I did not receive a letter from you.

Gerry Adams (Louth, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Tá ceist amháin agam faoi reachtaíocht atá geallta agus ceist eile faoi díospóireacht atá á lorg againn.

Legislation is pending on payment and protection for low-paid workers. Last week it appeared the Government agreed to widen the scope in the troika agreement to introduce a new clause which will allow employers to evade responsibilities for low-paid workers under the new joint labour committee system. Will the Government confirm whether new legislation will be required to fulfil this and whether the decision is a Government one? Vita Cortex, La Senza and Lagan Brick workers are protesting and last week 100 workers were paid off in Dundalk by Diageo. We need to protect workers' rights.

The Taoiseach promised a debate on the HSE service plan which will see 500,000 hours of home help care being taken away-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

We are straying a bit now.

Gerry Adams (Louth, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I will be restrained. We were promised a debate and I am simply asking when it will take place.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Maidir leis an cheist a chur an Teachta faoi reachtaíocht, níl eolas ar bith agam faoi Bille a bhaineann le oibrithe a bhfuil pá íseal acu. I do not have any information on legislation with regard to low-paid workers. There is no change to the industrial relations legislation as published and set out by the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation. The debate on the HSE will take place next week.

Joe Higgins (Dublin West, Socialist Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In the event that the European Union summit agrees a fiscal compact on Monday and in the event that the Attorney General states that it necessitates a referendum, what will be the Government's timetable in this regard?

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

That is speculative.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It would be a matter for the Whips.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In the event that agreement is reached on the wording and the text on Monday preparations will have to be made to sign it. When that has been completed on behalf of the Government I will ask the Attorney General for formal legal advice. When that formal legal advice is given I will inform the House of the outcome. The Deputy is speculating as to whether a referendum might be necessary. I already answered this on Question Time today.

Joe Higgins (Dublin West, Socialist Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Does the Taoiseach have any contingency plans?

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

If one is necessary it will be held and if it is not it will not.

Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Legal Services Regulation Bill is on the Order Paper for today. Last week I asked whether the regulatory impact assessment would be published in advance of the resumption of Second Stage and the Taoiseach said the Minister would correspond with me directly. I received a letter from him today which stated that ideally it would be published in advance of the legislation but he hopes after consulting with stakeholders that it will be available prior to Committee Stage.

I raised this at the Whips' meeting last week and I asked whether it would be on the Order Paper for this week. At a meeting I was told it would not be on the Order Paper for this week because the regulatory impact assessment had not been published and for other reasons. I was very surprised to see the Bill which was supposed to be on the Order Paper for today pulled and the Legal Services Regulation Bill replacing it. It is very difficult to plan work for the week and do business when one's legitimate expectation with regard to what will be on the Order Paper is not fulfilled.

I want certainty about the Legal Services Regulation Bill. It is not acceptable to receive the regulatory impact assessment prior to Committee Stage; we need it for Second Stage. Second State has commenced but it should not be resumed until we receive the regulatory impact assessment.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is fair to say there should be a break between Second Stage and Committee Stage. The Minister for Justice and Equality will be in the House this afternoon. Deputy Murphy was informed on Monday morning that Second Stage would continue. We are on the first round of speakers and there is a great deal of interest in the Bill. At the end of Second Stage analysis will need to be done of all of the comments made by all Deputies. If the regulatory impact assessment becomes available the Minister will circulate it for debate.

I would like all Deputies to have an opportunity to have their say on Second Stage and to have an analysis of their comments prior to Committee Stage as would be right and proper. I understand Deputy Murphy was informed on Monday morning that Second Stage would continue and that there would be a decent space between its conclusion and Committee Stage.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

We cannot have a debate now.

Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The point I am making is that a regulatory impact assessment is fundamental to Second Stage to understand how a Bill was teased out. One should have it in advance of Second Stage. My understanding of the programme for Government is that a commitment has been made to provide regulatory impact assessments.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Yes.

Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There is no point in doing this three quarters of the way through the process. It is required when debate commences on a Bill. It is very unsatisfactory.

Enda Kenny (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Deputy Murphy is well aware from her experience here that changes are made to Bills on Committee Stage when the Minister decides whether to accept amendments on the basis of their credibility and validity. It would be wonderful to have all of these things beforehand. The Legal Services Regulation Bill is enormous and it makes very great changes to the provision of legal services. The regulatory impact assessment will be available, but as the Deputy is aware changes are made to a Bill on Committee Stage and Second Stage is when Deputies from all parties comment on what they think should be in a Bill and how they consider it, whether good, bad or indifferent. Added to these comments will be reflections on the regulatory impact analysis, but it is on Committee Stage that these reflections are put into amendments submitted by Deputies which may be accepted by the Minister. It is then that a great deal of consultation will take place on this very extensive Bill.

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Minister of Social Protection is not in the House but I want to ask the Taoiseach about community employment schemes and the controversy and mess which exists. There is uncertainty and angst whereby the Department is writing to community employment sponsors, of which I am one-----

Paul Kehoe (Wexford, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

There is no legislation.

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is writing to all of the participant sponsor groups-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Where are you going with legislation?

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is obviously under the Finance Act, but I am asking what legislation-----

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

If it is obviously under the Finance Act why are you raising it on the Order of Business?

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I am raising it here because there is angst in communities throughout the country.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Then table a parliamentary question.

Mattie McGrath (Tipperary South, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context

People have been told one thing with a nod and a wink and community employment schemes are being devastated.

Seán Barrett (Dún Laoghaire, Ceann Comhairle)
Link to this: Individually | In context

You know well that is not on the Order of Business.

Paul Kehoe (Wexford, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

It is a local authority matter.