Michael Ring (Mayo, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for selecting this matter. This is the third or fourth time I have raised this issue on the Adjournment. There is a cost factor to every issue we raise but in this case, the money has been provided by the OPW and the Minister of State, and I compliment him on that. However, there is an ongoing problem between the OPW and the national parks and wildlife service. As I said, the money is in place. The OPW put forward a number of suggestions to the national parks and wildlife service. I believe another report went to the National Parks and Wildlife Service today.

What is going on is wrong. There were very serious floods in December 2006 and in January 2007, people's homes were destroyed and families had to relocate. We are coming into the winter and people are genuinely worried that this flooding problem cannot be resolved.

I am not looking for money or for the OPW to do the work because the money has been provided. Paperwork is holding up this work. It is wrong that the National Parks and Wildlife Service is causing a problem for people living in rural Ireland. It depends on the goodwill of people in rural Ireland and depends on them to protect the environment. Nobody wants to destroy the environment. There is a row between two Departments and I suppose there is an EU directive. There is a Habitats Directive. People's lives, livelihoods and homes are far more important than any habitat. I hope the Minister has good news.

The report will be with the National Parks and Wildlife Service tomorrow morning and I hope it is approved tomorrow evening. I have spoken to the families, the Irish Farmers Association and people in the area. If this issue is not resolved in the next two weeks, we will have a day out in Dublin. The Minister can tell security in the National Parks and Wildlife Service that we will not leave until it makes a decision. This is wrong because these people have been patient and have done their best to try to be nice and honourable about this. I hope the Minister has good news for me.

Batt O'Keeffe (Cork North West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank Deputy Ring for raising what is an important issue in that area. The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, shares the Deputy's concern about repeated flooding in the Roundfort-Hollymount area of County Mayo and the need for remedial action.

The area concerned involves two turloughs, which are part of the Kilglassan-Caheravoostia turlough complex special area of conservation. As such, it is protected under the EU Habitats Directive and is part of the EU's Natura 2000 network of protected areas. Turloughs, or lakes which disappear underground for part of the year, are a unique feature of this country and an irreplaceable part of our natural heritage. They are among the most distinctive features of Irish landscapes, and many are of international importance. This complex in Mayo is one of the most important and is host to a wide range of habitats.

Where proposed works would affect Natura 2000 sites, such as in this case, it is obligatory that the procedures adopted, in consideration and implementation of proposals, are in accordance with the directive. Accordingly, an appropriate assessment must be prepared in respect of any proposals for works which would be likely to damage the integrity of the site. This must consider the effects of the proposed works on the protected habitats.

All possible alternative solutions must be thoroughly examined. If works have to go ahead for reasons of over-riding public importance, all necessary avoidance and mitigation measures must be taken. In the case under consideration, it is important that the particular flood alleviation methods proposed by the OPW do not damage the hydrology of the turlough complex, for example, causing reduction in the extent or duration of flooding in the turloughs in normal years when water levels at the site would not be expected to give rise to concerns of over-riding public importance.

The Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government met with the Office of Public Works in April and again in June 2010 and it was agreed that certain additional design work was required on the proposed flood control structures. I understand the report on this design work was completed last week and that a copy of the report was sent to the Department today. It will be examined as quickly as possible and the Minister is hopeful that our obligations under EU law will have been met. This would allow early progress on commencing the flood mitigation works, although the precise timing is a matter for the OPW.