Dáil debates

Tuesday, 8 July 2008

Adjournment Debate

Waste Management.

11:00 pm

Photo of Ciarán LynchCiarán Lynch (Cork South Central, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank the Minister for attending the Chamber to address this issue. This is the fourth occasion on which I have sought a reply to this matter. On the day the story broke, I asked a junior Minister to clarify this issue and I did not receive an adequate response. When the Minister was in the House last week, I asked about this matter and received no response. This evening I received a short reply to a parliamentary question I tabled in which the Minister stated, "Anecdotal evidence suggests inert slag material was employed for this purpose during the period when the steelworks was in commercial operation but my Department does not hold any records or information from this period". He further stated that since 2003 "no material has been removed from slag heaps to be used in road construction, or indeed any other activity".

This is surprising given that in an article the Irish Examiner on Thursday, 11 August 2005, Eoin English wrote:

Environmental engineers moved onto the site of the former Irish Steel factory on Haulbowline Island in Cobh, Co. Cork, yesterday to begin the largest industrial clean-up in the history of the State. Consultants working for Cork County Council removed over 80,000 tonnes of hazardous and radioactive materials from the site last year. However, thousands of tonnes of waste material still has to be removed.

Given Ernst & Young, the company engaged by the Minister, was on the site at the time, his response that no material was removed after 2003 is unusual. It is on record that at least 80,000 tonnes was removed. People living in the harbour region know mountains of this material were on the island, which are no longer there, and they want to know where they have been moved.

Between 1998 and 2002, Haulbowline supplied road resurfacing material to two contractors: Road Maintenance Services Limited and Road Binders Limited. Both companies have registered offices at Unit 1G, Maynooth Business Park, Maynooth, County Kildare. RMS also has a sub-office in the Mallow area. They are part of the Colas conglomerate, which has more than 500 companies operating with a budget of €10.7 billion in more than 40 countries. Those companies were engaged in this and they were operating on NRA contracts.

Furthermore, I have a letter dated 1998 from a D. Daly, chief environment officer of Cork County Council at the time, who states:

We are considering how the matter of slag reuse might be progressed ... Slag from iron and steel manufacture is an amber list waste under this regulation which means that approval to movements must be sought from local authorities concerned and the movement must be tracked by the relevant forms.

Was a licence granted to these companies, given a licence must be granted by the local authority? If so, the Minister can provide traceability about where the material went on road projects to the House. If no licences were granted, our concern increases.

There can be no ambiguity by the Minister or his Department about whether this material was moved. An anecdotal response in a parliamentary question is completely insufficient. I am asking him for the fourth time to clarify whether material was removed from Haulbowline for road building and to state where are those roads.

Photo of Seán SherlockSeán Sherlock (Cork East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

In light of the revelations by Deputy Ciarán Lynch, we know materials were moved from this site to the mainland. The current investigation, therefore, must also examine material carried off site. We need to know where the material was transported to and how it was transported. Was a licence granted to transport it? Was only inert material transported? Is the material forming part of a slag heap somewhere in County Cork? Given the material was transported by a company based in Mallow, when did it transfer to Mallow? Is the material still in Mallow or has it been deposited in municipally licensed dumps in north Cork? Is material deposited in non-licensed facilities? Can the Minister confirm whether some material has ended up in other locations in north Cork? Will the Minister, on foot of these revelations, consider a further investigation and use the powers vested in him to seek to ensure complete traceability of all materials? Will he widen the remit of the current assessment of the site to ensure all traceable material, both on and off site, comes within the remit of that investigation? In light of these revelations, I also call on the Minister to meet the elected representatives of east Cork and the harbour area and, in particular, the mayor of Cobh immediately to listen to their concerns.

Photo of Kathleen LynchKathleen Lynch (Cork North Central, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Last week when we discussed this issue, we were less informed than we are now. Significant information has been garnered by people interested in this issue, particularly by the two previous speakers. Local people need to know what will happen with this site and how it will be made safe. When will the analysis be carried out to find out what is in the material? The people in the area are very worried for themselves, their children and, above all, the local economy, which will suffer as a result of these revelations. They need assurances from the Minister who is the only person who can assure them the necessary investigations are being carried out and that we will discover what is in the material, where it was transported to and how and when the site will be dealt with.

Earlier the Government announced adjustments or curtailments or whatever the Minister wants to call them under which €10 million will be cut from his budget in respect of remediation of landfills. If what we have found out to date is correct and material removed from this site could have ended up in various landfills, how will this cutback affect his response to this issue? Will the Haulbowline site not be dealt with as a matter of urgency? Will it mean when the materials are traced to other landfills, those sites will not be dealt with? The people in the lower harbour area in Cork want to know what the Minister will do about this and what assurances he can give them that the site will be dealt with speedily and properly? Above all else, those assurances are vital.

Photo of John GormleyJohn Gormley (Dublin South East, Green Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank the Deputies for raising this matter on the Adjournment. They will be aware that I have already responded to a parliamentary question submitted by Deputy Ciarán Lynch on this issue today. This gives me a further opportunity to address the issue, which has become the subject of much media speculation in recent days.

There has been a long history of industrial activity on Haulbowline Island, which was an important source of employment and a significant part of the local economy. The steelworks located there became the property of Irish Ispat, which went into liquidation in 2001. The State, acting through the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in a co-ordinating role, took over custody of the site from the liquidator in 2003, as mandated by Government. The mandate required the Department to co-ordinate all legal actions regarding the site and to address issues such as ongoing site security, maintenance and so on. It also required the Department to enable a site investigation to be carried out to assist in determining the best option, environmentally and economically, for the future use of the site and its remediation.

The steelworks operated on Haulbowline Island since 1939 at a time when such industrial activities were poorly regulated. Inevitably, the nature of the activity generated large quantities of waste, predominately inert slag, which were subsequently deposited on the island in an area that became known as the East Tip. I take this opportunity to confirm again for the House that, since my Department's involvement with the site began in 2003, no material has been removed from slag heaps to be used in road construction or other such commercial enterprises despite a number of approaches to my Department from interested parties in this regard. Anecdotal evidence suggests inert slag material was removed from the site and employed for this purpose during the period when the steelworks was in commercial operation and possibly also during the period when the liquidator owned the site. I can confirm that my Department does not hold any records or information regarding such activities during the periods in question. I also understand that Cork County Council is investigating the matter in respect of any licences or permits that might have issued for the removal for recycling of any slag material from the site. I assume that the mountains of material seen by residents and referred to by Deputy Ciarán Lynch were the so-called heaps of material for export.

As the Deputies are aware, my Department has now engaged consultants to carry out an independent and rigorous assessment of site conditions following the extensive unauthorised works by the subcontractors. The assessment, which has already begun, is divided into three distinct modules. White Young Green has had the full benefit of the advice of the EPA, the Marine Institute and the Health and Safety Authority in assessing the quality of surface water, marine sediment and mussel bivalves in the vicinity of Haulbowline Island, in assessing any health or environmental risks that may be posed by the recent works on the East Tip and in monitoring ambient air. The health and safety assessment will include sampling of slag-fill material across the East Tip. In 2005, White Young Green carried out an extensive intrusive site investigation that indicated no evidence of any immediate threat to human health or the environment. It is best suited to determining the best way forward in securing the site from an environmental and health and safety point of view in the short term pending a Government decision on its future use.

Deputy Kathleen Lynch referred to a so-called cutback or adjustment in respect of landfill remediation, but it will have no implication in terms of the Haulbowline Island situation. I assure the House that the investigation will continue unaffected. I have also given a commitment to local residents that a peer review will be carried out of both the 2005 report and the reports expected in the next five weeks from the ongoing White Young Green assessments. This is in line with best practice. The residents will be assured that they will be in receipt of the best international methodology. When I spoke to them, they called for a peer review, which I was happy to allow to proceed. I have further committed that the results of the ongoing assessment will be published and, as I informed the House last week, I will then advise the Government for purposes of decision making on whatever actions are shown to be necessary, including the question of any studies in regard to human health. I reassure the local residents and the House that my Department and other relevant agencies are properly engaged in the management of this legacy site in a manner consistent with good practice and the minimisation of risk to human health and the environment. A coherent overall approach rather than piecemeal action, which could inadvertently cause problems to the local community and the environment, must be taken, which is the objective being pursued by my Department.

A number of reports have been deposited in the Oireachtas Library. They are the 1995 and 1998 K. T. Cullen and Company reports, the 2002 O'Callaghan Moran report, the 2002 Enviros report and the 2005 White Young Green Report, which is on CD-ROM. I am committed to releasing any other useful information or reports. However, that there is considerable misinformation is a problem. When there is misinformation, fears are stirred up. I reassure people of my commitment to ensuring that relevant and accurate information is in the public domain to counter such misinformation.

The Dáil adjourned at 11.25 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 9 July 2008.