Michael Murphy (Tipperary South, Fine Gael)

Over recent months, the situation in Dundrum, south Tipperary, has become a test case for how we as a State balance urgent humanitarian obligations with proper process, transparency and respect for local communities. From the outset, I raised serious concerns about the lack of due diligence and transparency surrounding this decision, which regrettably have proven well founded.

A substantial public contract was entered into with a company only incorporated in January of this year. That fact alone should have triggered greater scrutiny. Instead, the process proceeded with minimal oversight, limited consultation and little clarity about accountability or planning compliance.

It is important to remember what Dundrum is. It is a small village of approximately 200 people, a place with deep roots and a strong sense of community. The golf course is at its heart. It was not merely an amenity. It was an historical landmark woven into the social and recreational life of generations. Its closure has had a devastating impact on local workers, clubs and residents. It represents the loss of a gathering place, a sense of identity and a shared heritage.

Now we face further uncertainty, with a section 5 declaration central to the legality of this development due before the High Court on Monday. There are serious issues at stake not only in this case, but wider afield. I will not comment on matters sub judice but it is clear that the process to date has fallen short in terms of the standards the public rightly expects in planning, governance and community engagement.

It is time to do the right thing. The Government should call a halt to this contract, take stock and ensure that future contracts are rooted in transparency, legal clarity and genuine local dialogue. Dundrum deserves nothing less than fairness, honesty and respect for its people, its heritage and its place in the life of the State.

See this speech in context