Maureen O'Sullivan (Dublin Central, Independent) | Oireachtas source

I thank the Minister for her reply. I have no doubt her reply will be looked at by those who have concerns and those who are critical of what is happening in this regard. From what I have heard from certain people, I do not believe it is just a small number of objectors. If this was in the best interests of everybody concerned, namely, those working for and those availing of the service, I do not believe we would have seen the consternation and dismay we have seen in the various debates on this matter. It is about evidence. It is not about people wanting to maintain the status quo.

The Minister referred to a cost-benefit analysis. Was there a risk analysis in that? What was the extent of consultations in that process? We all agree on the important service MABS has provided. Its mortgage advisers have almost seen 5,000 cases since 2015. The members of the current voluntary boards and CIS have a wide range of experience, much local knowledge and a genuine interest in the work, as well as wanting to make a difference. CIS has almost 1,000 volunteers working directly with the public. The whole debate has been causing them much stress and anxiety.

The 2010 Pathfinder report stated the board of the CIB places independence as a central principle for all projects coming under its remit. Core to CIS is that whole independence and impartiality. That is where some of the concerns are coming from about what is being proposed. Is that local voluntary effort being valued and respected?

See this speech in context