Michael McNamara (Clare, Labour) | Oireachtas source

Prior to Independence, the authorities introduced a programme under which they sponsored orchard plantations. However, one of the conditions of the programme was that growers plant a certain type of apple tree. As a result, the apple trees that had been grown since time immemorial were replaced by new strains of apples in the early years of the 20th century. This is only one example as similar developments occurred in area of grains.

While the efforts of Irish Seed Savers could be funded under the existing heading of "national culture and heritage", the amendment would avoid any doubt that groups which perform such an important function in maintaining our natural heritage and genetic diversity would be able to apply for funding. As Deputy O'Reilly stated, they would then have to jump through hoops as they completed the same application process that all applicants must complete. The contribution of groups involved in this area should be acknowledged.

For the avoidance of doubt, while I appreciate that the intentions of the Deputies who moved amendments Nos. 33 and 34 are exactly the same, if I were to choose which of the amendments should be accepted, it would be amendment No. 33 as it would be preferable to insert the words "natural environment" before the catch-all clause in paragraph (f).

See this speech in context