Peter Roche (Galway East, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I thank the witnesses for their comprehensive statements. It is fair to say there is some - I will not say "worrying acts" - stuff one would have to be concerned about.

I have four questions. I will not leave anyone out. I might start with Mr. Christie. My question is about AI and authentication. Given teachers' exposure or risk in verifying AI assisted work, would he back transparency calls on AACs until clear authentication and indemnity guidance are in place?

I will ask the four questions, as I am conscious I might run out of time and would then be unhappy.

My second question is for Mr. Gillespie about integration. What practical steps are needed to align the reformed senior cycle with transition year and leaving certificate applied, LCA, so that students experience coherent pathways rather than fragmented programmes?

Mr. Jones mentioned that risk assessment was not even mentioned in the current AAC guidance. Should the Department halt AACs in the sciences until updated safety in school science guidelines and technician supports are delivered?

Mr. Ó Caoimh is last. I thank him. It is nice to see youth come in with the experienced people and demonstrate and present a comprehensive statement. He mentioned that more than 70% of students reported high stress levels. What reforms in assessment scheduling or subject load would genuinely cut that stress rather than add to it?

Perhaps the witnesses will answer in the order I asked the questions.