Micheál Carrigy (Longford-Westmeath, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

I have a couple of points. I know there were a lot of mentions of the former director not being reappointed. I think the Minister was right not to agree to a five-year term subject to all this happening and before everything related to this fiasco was teased out. I think he was right with regard to that. All contracts for delivery of the system were entered into after the appointment of the former director. Despite the fact that a good job was done in the role, I think the Minister was right to hold off on another five-year term.

On the legal bill, what are the costs associated with this?