Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Okay. I might pursue that in a different direction. Mr. Carville talked about other jurisdictions and how NAMA was constructed. There were obviously flaws in the legislation in that there were people who may well have been a director. There was certainly a difficulty with the definitions in the legislation. On the face of it, there are people who got back control of their assets. Is there any closing off of the legislation in that attention is drawn to things that did not work or where there were flaws in the legislation? Historical and institutional memory is important in these things. The idea of saying this worked without drawing attention to such matters is to misrepresent the position. What happens in that regard?