Maurice Quinlivan (Limerick City, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Today we will look at artificial intelligence, AI, in the workplace. Advantages in technology have brought many opportunities for positive change in the workplace. However, developments in technology have also brought new risks and challenges that require appropriate scrutiny to ensure the rights of businesses and staff are sufficiently protected through robust legislation and policy. Emerging technology and artificial intelligence will have a particularly profound impact in several professions such as law, journalism and the creative industries. Today I am pleased that we have an opportunity to consider this and other related matters with our witnesses.

From the O'Reilly institute in Trinity College Dublin I welcome Professor Gregory O'Hare, professor of artificial intelligence and head of the school of computer science and statistics. From the Bar Council of Ireland I welcome Mr. Ronan Lupton SC. From the Irish Congress of Trade Unions I welcome Dr. Laura Bambrick, social policy officer, and Mr. David Joyce, equality officer, development officer, global solidarity officer and policy officer.

Before we begin I will mention parliamentary privilege. I will explain some limitations to parliamentary privilege and the practice of the Houses as regards references witnesses may make to another person in their evidence. The evidence of witnesses physically present or who give evidence from within the parliamentary precincts is protected pursuant to both the Constitution and statute by absolute privilege. Witnesses are again reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction.

The three opening statements have been circulated to members. To commence our consideration of this matter, I invite Professor O'Hare to make his opening remarks on behalf of Trinity College Dublin.