Michael Creed (Cork North West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am on the complex of Leinster House. I am trying to keep an eye on the proceedings of another committee as well.

I thank our witnesses for the incredible work they do which, while often hidden and away from the public eye, is nonetheless hugely important for the children in question. Ms Ryan articulated that EPIC's role is to ensure the voice of the child is upheld and to empower children in care. I am interested in the concept of the voice of the child in various forums where the child’s interests are discussed relative to the professional qualification of the representative of the child in those proceedings because as parents we often know that children’s articulation of what they perceive to be in their best interests very often differs from what the parents’ view might be. In similar circumstances, I imagine that the voice of the child being upheld at various forums must be a qualified voice in the sense that the professional representative of the child may feel that what the child may want in terms of various issues could be contrary to his or her best interests. How is that perceived conflict resolved in the context of the child feeling that his or her voice has been heard? I am curious about that. It might be rather an academic observation. I presume the conflict between what we perceive to be in the child’s best interests and what the child might feel is in his or her interests is the same in the context of court proceedings for guardian ad litem or anybody advocating on behalf of children. I presume it boils down to the professional qualifications and judgment of the representative. Across the board, in terms of guardians ad litem, independent advocates or foster parents representing foster children, how does that perceived conflict resolve itself?