Martin Browne (Tipperary, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Before we start, I wish to explain some limitations to parliamentary privilege and the practice of the Houses as regards references to other persons witnesses may make in their evidence. The evidence of witnesses physically present or who give evidence from within the parliamentary precincts is protected, pursuant to both the Constitution and statute, by absolute privilege. Witnesses are again reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity, by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable, or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity.

Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative they comply with any such direction.

Before we hear from our witnesses, I propose we publish the opening statement on the committee's website. Is that agreed? Agreed.

On behalf of the committee I extend a warm welcome to Mr. Ger Deering, Ombudsman and Ms Jennifer Hanrahan, senior investigator at the Office of the Ombudsman. I suggest Mr. Deering make his opening statement for about ten minutes. We will then have questions and comments from members, each of whom will have approximately ten minutes. This will allow members to contribute again in the second round. I invite Mr. Deering to make his opening statement.