Colm Brophy (Dublin South West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The purpose of our session is to follow up on a good briefing the committee had from the Parliamentary Budget Office, PBO, on its paper on tax expenditures.

I draw the attention of witnesses to the fact that by virtue of section 17(2)(l) of the Defamation Act 2009, they are protected by absolute privilege in respect of their evidence to the committee. However, if they are directed by the committee to cease giving evidence on a particular matter and they continue to so do, they are entitled thereafter only to a qualified privilege in respect of their evidence. They are directed that only evidence connected with the subject matter of these proceedings is to be given and they are asked to respect the parliamentary practice to the effect that, where possible, they should not criticise or make charges against any person, persons or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable.

Members are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect that they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the House or an official either by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable.

I wish to thank the witnesses again for attending here today. The witnesses have combined their opening statement and I appreciate that.