Tim Lombard (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Dr. Beamish is correct. However, let us look at Teagasc model. Teagasc is a statutory body that advises the Department, but a farmer can bring his agricultural adviser from Teagasc to the appeals hearing. The crossover is not quite so drastic as Dr. Beamish is stating.

I see a great similarity between the role of the BIM and Teagasc. I see it as something that needs to be looked at. The benefit from the agricultural point of view to having that independent body coming to a person through a process is very helpful.

Dr. Beamish states how open he is to working with the applicant. While that must be acknowledged, there is a place and time in the industry for looking for a Teagasc-style body to be put in place so that those in this sector can benefit from it.