Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees
Thursday, 9 March 2017
Public Accounts Committee
Business of Committee
9:00 am
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We are joined by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Mr. Seamus McCarthy, a permanent witness at the committee. He is accompanied by Ms Ruth Foley, deputy director of audit. Apologies have been received from Deputy Marc MacSharry.
The first item on the agenda is the minutes of the meeting of 2 March 2017. Are they agreed to? Agreed.
The next item is matters arising from the minutes. There are no special items that we will not deal with during the course of dealing with the agenda.
No. 3 is correspondence received since the last meeting. We will put it on the screen. In category A No. 328A is a briefing document from the HSE for today's meeting. We shall note and publish it. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 329A is the opening statement from Mr. Tony O'Brien, director general of the HSE. We shall note and publish it. Is that agreed? Agreed.
Category B is correspondence received from Accounting Officers or Ministers, or both, as follow-ups on previous meetings. Nos. 300B (i-iii) and 331B are correspondence, dated 17 February 2017 and 8 March 2017, from Mr. Maurice Quinn, Secretary General, Department of Defence. The correspondence comprises a follow-up to his appearance before the committee on 26 January and a subsequent information request. It was held over from last week. Does any member wish to comment? The second letter came last night. It deals specifically with the maintenance cost of the Gulfstream IV aircraft. I suggest we hold it over because we have not had time to consider it. There is some conflicting information in the public arena on the issue. We will come back to these two items of correspondence.
Nos. 313B and 330B are correspondence, dated 22 February 2017 and 7 March 2017, from Mr. Noel Waters, Secretary General, Department of Justice and Equality, following up on his appearance before the committee on 2 February. This correspondence was also held over from the last meeting. It deals with various aspects of the restorative justice schemes. There is a note on how many staff have been saved by the new building development programme which I think comes under the prison programme. There is a note on PACE, as it is called. Can we note it? There is also information on the number of assaults on prison officers in 2016. We asked for that information and it has come in separately. It is the most recent letter to which I referred. Can we note these items of correspondence and move on? If members wish to read and use them according to their own perspectives, they may do so.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I asked a particular question about restorative justice.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The Deputy has received her reply and is free to take and work with it once we have it published.
Category C is correspondence from private individuals or other correspondence. No. 320C is correspondence, dated 15 February 2017, received from an individual regarding fraud allegations made by Teagasc officials. The last committee received correspondence from this individual and subsequent replies from Teagasc. The secretariat is working on putting the information together and will circulate it among committee members for the next meeting. Can we agree to return to this topic at the next meeting? It was dealt with previously. We need to get the information given to the last Committee of Public Accounts. I received a registered letter from the individual concerned which I passed on to the secretariat this morning. We will come back to the general topic at next week's meeting. Is that agreed? Agreed.
No. 321C is correspondence, dated 25 February 2017, from Connolly for Kids Hospital on the building of the national children's hospital. As no date has yet been set for that meeting, we can ask the spokesperson to send a written submission, as indicated in the correspondence. We have written to the National Paediatric Hospital Development Board and the Department of Health about the estimates for the project and costs incurred to date, asking in addition how it arrived at the original estimates. Obviously, the Connolly for Kids Hospital group has contacted us. The first thing we will do is take a written submission. Is that agreed? Agreed. We will be coming back to the issue directly. I also believe the health committee may be considering it.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes, it is.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will be coming back to the issue.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is fair enough. Obviously, the argument in favour of a different location for the hospital is related but separate. It does not really concern us. I ask that we check with the health committee to ensure the expenditure to date, the projected expenditure, the estimates and the forecasts are absolutely, thoroughly and rigorously examined. The figures in the public domain indicate that it will be the most expensive children's hospital ever anywhere on the globe, which is absolutely shocking. In terms of our role, we know that there is that information or speculation; therefore, we have an obligation to investigate it and make sure we get some answers. We do not want to duplicate the work of another committee, but the health committee might take a slightly different slant on things than we might. Do we have a way of talking to it?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As a member of both committees, I can inform members that the health committee is dealing with this issue. Issues regarding decision-making that date back a long time will be discussed by it. The issue of costs will come into the debate, including projected costs, costs already committed to and predicted costs. From the health committee's perspective, it is a question of decision-making and the timelines involved. We ought to be careful to ensure both committees will not do more or less the same thing. I suggest the Chairman talk to the Chairman of the other committee or that two clerks talk to each other about this, such that we could analyse projections and costs, while the other committee could analyse decision-making and policy.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I entirely agree. Whatever way we do it, we need to make sure our piece of the work will be covered to ensure the issue will be rigorously examined because very large sums of public money are involved.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay. We will arrange for communication between myself and the Chairman or the respective clerks to the committee, and we will send a note to the committee so that committee members will know while they are looking at it we will also be considering an aspect in order that we will not duplicate each other's work.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Exactly.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I want to ensure everything is covered.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Super.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank the members. That is good.
The next item is No. 322C, dated 25 February 2017, from an individual regarding the closure of Harold's Cross greyhound stadium. Are we bringing in Bord na gCon at some stage?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes. I wanted to raise this. I understand this will be topical after tonight's programme about which we all will be talking, as on many other occasions. Bord na gCon needs to be brought before the Committee of Public Accounts. We have spoken about this previously. We need to bring them really high up the line. I would ask, with the indulgence of the committee members, that when we are looking at schedule, we consider bringing them in at the earliest opportunity possible.
From the information that has been provided to many members of the committee - certainly, I have been provided with a considerable volume of information and I have spoken about this in the Dáil - it is an organisation that needs analysis, and quickly.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did the Joint Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine bringing them in?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The Joint Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine has spoken to them but there is a depth of analysis in relation to costs and spending that needs to be done by the Committee of Public Accounts, which would have a far wider remit.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The Comptroller and Auditor General produced a report on Bord na gCon previously.
Mr. Seamus McCarthy:
We did. There were two aspects to it. One was the development of Limerick Stadium but at that stage, already there were difficulties around their financial position. Part of that report dealt with that and flagged up that they had a level of debt that might be difficult for them to sustain.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The key issue for some of us on the committee who went into the depths of this is that there is decision-making going on at present based on historical debt. How that debt was arrived at and the decision-making around that, and now the decision-making around the industry as a result of how they ended up with that debt, really needs thorough analysis. The result of it is an industry that, to be frank, is going down the toilet. It is an industry that is collapsing as we speak and it needs to be arrested.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is fine. A lot of taxpayers' money goes directly into the greyhound fund.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Absolutely.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is noted and agreed. We will put it on the work programme, which topic we will come to in a few minutes.
On correspondence, No. 323C (i and ii), dated 28 February, is from the HSE, in reply to information sought on Our Lady's Hospital, Cashel. Does Deputy Kelly wish to comment on this? We also will forward a copy to Deputy Mattie McGrath.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I read this in detail and I have a number of questions relating to the figures that have been provided. As a follow-up on that, I will prepare some questions to the HSE. I accept the bona fides of the HSE in what it sent us. However, the real issue here is not the figures. There are two issues. The first is that the figures that have been quoted publicly in HSE forums versus the figures that are quoted here. This is the first time these figures have ever been quoted - I have never come across them. They do not correlate with what has been told to HSE forums, figures which have been publicly spoken about and received in the media. I will ask questions on that.
The second issue is more interesting. When the HSE in this response outlines the type of services that were being made available as a result of the capital expenditure, by and large, they do not exist. If the volume of capital spending is accurate - I cannot doubt the bona fides of what has been written here - why are the services, as a result of both capital expenditures of significant money, not in place? I visited this hospital with the current Minister and there was not a single patient there. Those services are not there or at least are not working to the level of which the capital expenditure would justify.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Does Deputy Kelly want to-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will follow up.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will come back to this. We will hold that correspondence. It is not relevant to the specific topic today for the HSE.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I presume at some point-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The HSE will be back.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We agreed - in fairness, a couple of Deputies, including Deputy Cullinane, were fairly strong on this too - we are to do a section here on capital spending-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Exactly, capital expenditure.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----and they have written to us asking if we would want anything over €5 million because of their minor works. We need to make a decision on when we will do that too. We can deal with this issue as part of that.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As part of our review of capital expenditure, that is good. We note that. We will return to it as part of our future work programme.
No. 324C (i and ii), dated 24 February, is from NAMA, following up on the sale of the Savarin portfolio in the Czech Republic. Can we agree to forward this to the original correspondent and note it? Agreed.
No. 325C, dated 24 February, from Deputy Niall Collins, relates to investigations into HR and financial irregularities in the University of Limerick. The committee notes this. As the university will be before the committee on 30 March, we will discuss this matter then. We will notify the University of Limerick that this issue will be specifically raised so that its representatives will have full answers for us when they arrive.
No. 326C (i and ii), dated 27 February, is from the Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment. We are awaiting a further response from the Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government on this issue of salmon fishing. We will come back to that when we get the second reply.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Can I see that correspondence?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
This correspondence is from the Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment. We are awaiting the second reply from the Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government. When we get the two replies, we will come back to that topic.
No. 327C (i and ii), dated 28 February, is from the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. This is a letter stating that a new witness protocol will be in place. We note that. This comes to every committee. The committee will ask as quickly as possible for a legal briefing on the Kerins case because it emanated from the previous Committee of Public Accounts. The parliamentary legal adviser is available to come in when required for a briefing.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On that issue, there was a briefing note sent to an Teachta McDonald following that Kerins case from the legal team here. It would be important, even if it is in private session, that we are given a full briefing on it at some point, and also to take on board its implications. We have not done that formally, as a committee. At some point - if it could be in a private session, it might be more appropriate - we might consider doing that.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Deputy Cullinane is quite right.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On the private session, it might be appropriate to clarify whether a session is ever private in due course.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is a good point. It is a misnomer in this place.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Absolutely. It is an issue we should come back to. I agree it should be in private session but there is no such thing apparently.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There is not.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We might come back to that.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is a valid point. We stated if there are leaks as a result of yesterday's meeting, we will formally be raising-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There were leaks fairly quickly.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There were leaks within minutes from yesterday. We will come back to that after Tuesday next.
Josepha Madigan (Dublin Rathdown, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I want to talk to the Chairman as well about yesterday-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
No. We will just stick-----
Josepha Madigan (Dublin Rathdown, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----but not right now.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay. I will ask the secretariat to formally arrange that briefing with the Office of the Parliamentary Legal Adviser and to come back to us with a suitable time.
No. 332C, dated 8 March 2017, is from the HSE, regarding correspondence we received last week about staff of the former charity Console. This was received late yesterday evening. The issue here is, essentially, that there were persons working for Console who have not been paid their wages - I have not read the full details of the letter; Console has gone into liquidation, none of its debts and liabilities have been paid; and the HSE is saying that it is a section 39 agency agreement and the HSE is not legally liable for any liabilities of such organisations. That is technically legally correct. However, that is not good enough. I suggest we take this matter up directly with the Minister for Health. We cannot preside over a situation where the staff members who were working for Console do not get paid. It may not be the HSE's legal responsibility but somebody has to pay them. We will take that up directly with the Minister.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Is there funding put aside for that purpose?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I do not know.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was my understanding - I could be wrong - there was funding put aside to pay wages.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will ask the Department of Health, which is the overall body.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
At the previous meeting, we agreed that we would ask for them to respond with a breakdown of what happened following-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Who was to respond?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
For the HSE to give us a document on what happened when a new company got the contract, and how much is owed and why is it owed. We do not seem to have the full picture.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On that we are agreed. Sometimes they will say they cannot give us that legally until the liquidation has been completed.
However, somebody has to pay the staff in the meantime and if it is not the HSE, we will have to raise the matter directly with the Minister for Health because the staff cannot be left out of pocket.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I agree with the Chairman. The staff of Console are being given the brush-off and are out of pocket. As they set out in the letter, they, like everyone else, have bills to pay and families to care for. They are in this position not least because of the failure of the Health Service Executive to monitor and control the section 39 agency in question, namely, Console. It is doubly unacceptable, therefore, that the HSE has taken the attitude described. What we need to figure out is how to get recourse for the staff in question because they cannot be left in a position where they are out of pocket for a couple of months. I do not know how the committee can achieve this if the HSE's argument is that Console is a section 39 agency and, as such, has nothing to do with it or the Department.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will raise the matter with the parent Department.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will probably have to be creative and persistent.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As Deputy McDonald indicated, the committee asked for a breakdown of the staff. Moreover, some staff kept their jobs. How was the decision made to transfer and retain some staff? Responsibility for what occurred in Console lies with senior management of the organisation. It would be interesting to obtain a breakdown showing which personnel remained in employment when they were transferred to Pieta House and which staff did not retain their jobs. How was this decision reached?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Members appear to be ad idem on this issue.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I do not propose to repeat the comments of previous speakers. Does the committee have any responsibilities in respect of the Charities Regulator given that the individual who we have been discussing is still active? It would be unconscionable if the same mistake were to be repeated.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
If someone sends a letter to the committee on the issue, we will follow it up.
Josepha Madigan (Dublin Rathdown, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
While I understand the reason the Health Service Executive is trying to wash its hands of its responsibility for the staff, the committee cannot abandon them. I echo everything other members have said on this issue.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The committee must find out what process was used in deciding which staff retained their jobs. Who knows how that worked out? It could be a case of putting one layer on top of another. Was favouritism shown? Given what occurred in Console, it would be frightening if this were allowed to happen. From the correspondence received, it is clear that a flag is being waved to highlight that something is happening here. We need to check out this issue. The timing will be very important.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will write directly to the liquidator, Health Service Executive and Minister for Health. We are all agreed that we will not let this issue go.
No. 4 is reports, statements and accounts received since our previous meeting. The first, No. 4.1, is the Health and Social Care Professionals Council 2015, which receives a clear audit opinion, except in respect of non-recognition of pension costs, which is a regular occurrence in public bodies.
No. 4.2 is the Pre-hospital Emergency Care Council, which receives a clear audit opinion, except in respect of pension costs. The council specifies and monitors standards in the delivery of pre-hospital treatment. Deputies are welcome to examine the accounts to find out more about the organisation.
No. 4.3 is the Dublin Docklands Development Authority, DDDA, cessation accounts, which receives a clear audit opinion for the 14-month period between 1 January 2015 and 29 February 2016. The accounts essentially deal with the wind-up of the DDDA.
No. 4.4 is the Grand Canal Harbour Management Company limited, which receives a clear audit opinion. We will ask the Comptroller and Auditor General to comment on the accounts, which relate to 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2015. I do not see accounts for 2014 here.
Mr. Seamus McCarthy:
The accounts for 2014 have already been submitted. There are two subsidiaries of the Dublin Docklands Development Authority and the 2014 accounts were submitted. When we were looking at the submission of accounts in the context of our special report, we identified that earlier financial statements had not been submitted to the committee. There are two companies so they were filing them with the Companies Office. The second one is Dublin Docklands Affordable Housing.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Accounts for five years have been submitted for Dublin Docklands Affordable Housing.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There was no activity. The Comptroller and Auditor General raises an interesting point. The committee asked that he provide a report on all the companies audited by his office in respect of the timeliness of the report. As he indicated, some of the companies audited by his office have subsidiaries which we did not ask him to examine. It is not good enough that the committee is informed of the position regarding the parent company if it has significant subsidiaries which have not been captured by our request to the Comptroller and Auditor General. Does the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General also audit the subsidiary companies?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In other words, the Comptroller and Auditor General consolidated unaudited subsidiary accounts.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Why were they not published?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was the Dublin Docklands Development Authority required to submit the accounts of subsidiaries to the Oireachtas?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is required to submit them.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will be conscious in future that other companies may also have subsidiaries. Do any other major organisations have similar groups of subsidiary companies?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
For all the racetracks.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Have they submitted them directly?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We may ask the Comptroller and Auditor General to provide the committee with a schedule of all the subsidiaries of Bord na gCon, including the various racetracks, and their final accounts, if they have all been audited.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is good. It would be useful to the committee to have the list.
No. 5 is the work programme. Representatives of the Health Service Executive will appear today to discuss specific issues only. We will then have three meetings on education, one each with the Department of Education and Skills, Higher Education Authority and universities of Limerick, Cork and Galway. On Thursday, 6 April, we will meet representatives of other third level institutions. These have yet to be confirmed but they will be institutes of technology. There is a gap on 13 April which we have not filled. The committee can consider one of three different issues on that date, namely, direct provision, Bord na gCon or the Comptroller and Auditor General's report, to be published today, on the redress scheme. As this report, which is a look-back on the entire scheme concluding with Caranua, will be published later, Mr. McCarthy cannot disclose its contents now.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is a special report to which the committee will revert. Direct provision has been raised on a number of occasions and members also wish to deal with Bord na gCon. Given that members have been asking for a meeting to discuss direct provision for several months, perhaps we will discuss the specific chapter on direct provision in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report on 13 April.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Is the meeting with representatives of third level institutions on 6 April confirmed or may we discuss another topic on that date?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We have been in touch with all the institutions and it is now a matter of confirming times. However, after three meetings on third level institutions, the committee will want to move on to other topics. For this reason, we are proposing to condense the discussion on higher education to three meetings. They will be long days if various groups each appear for one or two hours.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is terrible to be asked to choose between the three issues referred to by the Chairman. The special report on the redress schemes is very important work, which is also highly topical given the turn of events around the Tuam mother and baby home and the need to re-examine the issue of mother and baby homes. Not only is this work very important, but it could also be very useful in dovetailing with other things that need to be done. That is not to argue against dealing with direct provision or Bord na gCon. There are only so many weeks in the year.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I have no doubt we will get to all three issues.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
May I ask-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There is no guarantee that we will be here next year.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am an optimist.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The report is being published today and we will need to examine what it contains, but I am anxious that it not drift and that we will schedule it.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could we pull the sheet down further? Obviously, the committee has undertaken a large volume of work on Project Eagle. It took up a great deal of our time. Is there any capacity to hold two meetings every second or third week?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am open to that. Does the Deputy mean on different days or split between the morning and afternoon?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The report on redress is coming out, for example, but I am not sure that we can deal with it in one week.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Do members wish to hold a special meeting on the redress report on another day while we continue with other meetings?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As someone who attends on a regular basis, I would have no difficulty with that, but it is impossible to keep this pace up and people have not attended other extra meetings. Theoretically, it is wonderful. In practice, it is difficult. Deputies are attending other meetings. We are running in and out. Let us be realistic. We have given it our all to produce the report on Project Eagle. The Chairman knows that more than anyone. Let us not decide to have second meetings when it is impossible and would take from other business. People do not attend. I have attended meetings where we needed to find quorums or the meetings were cancelled. While I respect what has been said, the reality on the ground is far from easy. We would have to give this level of commitment at two meetings. I am repeating myself and will not have made my point.
Josepha Madigan (Dublin Rathdown, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is difficult, given that we are all sitting on other committees, sometimes simultaneously. We must strike a balance between trying to be realistic, as Deputy Connolly stated, and trying to get through our workload.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I have no issue. I probably understand that more than anyone. This week, I was committed to six or seven meetings because I am on three committees. I am on a committee that usually sits at the same time as this one. However, there are topics that we would normally have got through by now but we have not been able to because of Project Eagle. Everyone is working hard, but we might be able to address the redress issue separately while getting on with our normal work programme. Otherwise, the issues of direct provision and Bord na gCon - I have been pushing on the latter for a long time - will not get onto our work programme for a considerable period.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I notice in the schedule that there is a two-week gap between meetings over Easter. We will meet on 13 April and then 4 May. The Dáil will be off for that period, but there is nothing stopping us from having a Thursday meeting. The committee does not have to skip almost three weeks because of the Easter recess. We will certainly take Easter week or whatever it is. The dates in question are 20 and 27 April.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That will certainly put it up to the committee.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The meeting does not have to be on a Thursday if it is not a Dáil sitting week. I propose that we use one of those two weeks for a meeting, although obviously not Easter week.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Which week, then?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The week of 27 April.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We should schedule for-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We do not have to have the meeting on a Thursday.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We could hold it on a Wednesday.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
If some members will not be present, we could hold it on the Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Are we prevented from sitting on a holy day?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Absolutely.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Holy Thursday.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The Dáil is closed the week after Easter, not the week of Holy Thursday. We should definitely have a meeting the week after that, though.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We can shove them back.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We could reschedule.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
May I make a suggestion?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will make progress.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will try to be helpful. Could we examine the report when it is published today?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It will be out today.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Deputy Connolly is right to caution that we should not bite off more than we can chew. We can assess the report and determine whether it is possible to reschedule.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I do not want to reschedule the meetings that have been arranged with the universities.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Fine. There are three issues before us that we believe are important. The Comptroller and Auditor General has made the helpful suggestion that the 4 and 11 May meetings, while necessary, are not time sensitive. Is that correct?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could we fit in the three issues and then revert to the other two?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
They might move back a week or two.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Possibly up to three weeks.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
For next week, we will ask for-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
A schedule that includes the three issues in question and pushes the other two back, given that they are not-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What are the three?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Direct provision,-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Direct provision is already scheduled for that day.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is not. It is on the list, but there is no date for it. We need a date for the direct provision chapter.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I put this in my diary. It was provisionally listed for April.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was definitely mentioned.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
For 13 April.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
But we did not sign off on the work programme. The three issues are direct provision, Bord na gCon and the special report on the redress scheme. Is that the right title?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will ask the secretariat to provide at our meeting of Thursday week a revised work programme incorporating these three topics. Is that agreed? All three will be scheduled. If we must move the Revenue and Department of Finance meetings back a week or two, so be it. We will still get to them in the month of May. That is helpful. We will have a revised work schedule for our next meeting.