Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees
Thursday, 13 October 2016
Public Accounts Committee
Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General: National Asset Management Agency Sale of Project Eagle (Resumed)
9:00 am
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Today the committee will continue its examination of the Comptroller and Auditor General’s Special Report No. 94 on the National Asset Management Agency, or NAMA as it is better known, and its sale of Project Eagle. Project Eagle was the code name given to the sale of NAMA’s Northern Ireland loan portfolio.
We have already had meetings with Comptroller and Auditor General on his report, with NAMA and with the Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael Noonan, and his officials. Today Mr. Brian Rowntree is before the committee and I would like to thank him sincerely for making himself available. Mr. Rowntree was a member of NAMA's Northern Ireland advisory committee, NIAC, at the time of the sale of Project Eagle. The NIAC was established by the NAMA board in January 2010. It comprised four NAMA board members, NAMA’s head of asset recovery and two external members. The main purpose of the NIAC was to make recommendations to the NAMA board on matters pertaining to Northern Ireland in the context of NAMA’s objectives and functions and to make recommendations to the board concerning NAMA’s strategy for Northern Ireland assets.
We are also joined today by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Mr. Seamus McCarthy, and his colleague, Ms Mairead Cosgrove.
I remind members, witnesses and those in the Public Gallery to switch off their mobile phones. I wish to advise witnesses that by virtue of section 17(2)(l) of the Defamation Act 2009, they are protected by absolute privilege in respect of their evidence to this committee. If they are directed by the committee to cease giving evidence in relation to a particular matter but they continue to so do, they are entitled thereafter only to a qualified privilege in respect of their evidence. They are directed that only evidence connected with the subject matter of these proceedings is to be given and are asked to respect the parliamentary practice to the effect that, where possible, they should not criticise nor make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable. Members are reminded of the provisions within Standing Order 186 that the committee shall also refrain from inquiring into the merits of a policy or policies of the Government or a Minister of the Government or the merits of the objectives of such policies. Finally, members are reminded of the long-standing ruling of the Chair to the effect that they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the House or an official by name in such a way as to make him or her identifiable.
I invite Mr. Rowntree to make his opening statement.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I thank the Chairman and Deputies for the invitation to attend this meeting today. My opening remarks will simply lay before the committee the facts as they apply to me as a member of the NIAC at the time of Project Eagle, the sale of the NAMA Northern Ireland loan portfolio. I wish to confirm that the complete sale of Project Eagle was a matter for the main board and senior executive team of NAMA. A decision was taken by the NAMA board to oversee this process under strict controls and we, as the Northern Ireland advisory board, were in no way consulted, referenced or updated on the detail on the bid and sale process and the resulting compliance issues. I respected this decision and at no time during, prior to or subsequent to the sale process did I make any personal or corporate interventions to the NAMA board or executive team, to the bidders in this process, PIMCO and Cerberus, political representatives, political parties, civil servants, other investors' or potential bidders' representatives or developers. At all times I respected the corporate governance provisions surrounding the Project Eagle sale process, the commercial confidentiality of the process as well as the corporate integrity of the NAMA board and senior executive team.
As a member of the NIAC I was updated on the original interest expressed by PIMCO but only in general outline terms and no specifics of the interest were discussed with us as a committee. After this outline briefing no further outline updates were offered and none were sought by me. At subsequent NIAC meetings the committee was simply told that Project Eagle was still a live process. I was never informed of the Cerberus bid and I was notified of the sale agreement and the NAMA board sign-off the day before the public announcement of its completion. Mr. Frank Daly, the NAMA chairman, rang me to inform me of the successful conclusion to Project Eagle.
At NIAC meetings we were not made aware of direct or perceived individual conflicts of interest as noted by individual members. Declarations of conflicts were noted in writing at the start of each meeting by each person attending and we had to regularly update our own personal register of interests. All such records were held centrally by the NAMA corporate governance directorate. NAMA put in place a robust corporate governance framework which applied to all component parts of its operation, including the NIAC, and as members we were subject to regular training and update discussions on governance provisions. At all times I respected and adhered to this strict governance framework. An organisation with such a commercially sensitive mission as NAMA's can only be effective and respected when all stakeholders adhere to the principles of good governance.
The NIAC was not a decision-making forum and we all understood this from day one. The committee was purely a consultative and advisory framework on strategic aspects of NAMA business and dealings that had particular reference to the socio-economic indicators for Northern Ireland. The NIAC did not engage or seek to engage in the details of individual debtor portfolios and individual debtor cases were not discussed. The discussions at the NIAC were high-level, strategic impact discussions on the direction of travel for NAMA in respect of the assets secured against the consolidated debts. Members of the committee were fully aware that NAMA did not own such assets but were equally aware that the ownership and control of the debt resulted in de facto control of the assets.
With this in mind, the NAMA Northern Ireland advisory committee reached agreement with the main NAMA board not to engage in a fire sale of Northern Ireland assets so as not to adversely impact further on the Northern Ireland property market. With this in mind, it was also understood by the committee that the Northern Ireland Executive would not control but would be informed of the work of NAMA in Northern Ireland.
Through the NAMA Northern Ireland advisory committee also undertook high-level strategic asset studies. Such research was indicated as strictly confidential and the university undertaking the study also engaged with other banks and lenders on comparable research to provide a confidential high-level consolidated report indicating the opportunity for selected asset type development to extract realistic value from the loan book, both current and projected.
It is important that the allegations surrounding the Project Eagle sale are investigated in full and that any such investigations look also at the corporate governance controls, both executive and non-executive, surrounding the bid process. It is important that integrity is the key principle in any such investigations and any confirmed breach of integrity must have supporting accountability and sanction. I fully support the essential desire and drive for the facts and truth surrounding the allegations leading to the sale of Project Eagle.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree. The procedure is that members of the committee who have indicated will put some questions to Mr. Rowntree and, hopefully, he will be able to answer as best he can from his own direct knowledge. Members indicated in the following sequence: Deputy Cullinane; Deputy Catherine Murphy; Deputy Kelly; and Deputy Connolly. I call Deputy Cullinane.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree for accepting the invitation to attend and for his opening remarks. I welcome him to the meeting. What is Mr. Rowntree's understanding of the terms of reference and the remit of the Northern Ireland advisory committee of NAMA?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
From my understanding, we were issued with a set of terms of reference by the main NAMA board at the very start. We worked to a direction of travel which was laid out by the main NAMA board. The majority of members of the Northern Ireland advisory committee were main NAMA board members. As an advisory forum, it was primarily driven from the main NAMA board. The forum, as I have already outlined, was seen as a consultative forum with no decision-making powers or capacity. The forum was one where, in the main, matters pertaining to discussions at the main board that had an impact on Northern Ireland were primarily discussed. There was not a huge degree of interrogation of other areas of activity within the Northern Ireland advisory committee and the minutes of the meeting indicate that. I have commented on the research which was something I was very keen on because we needed an evidence base to talk about the impact of what was happening in Northern Ireland. The land issues in Northern Ireland were totally different to those in the Republic of Ireland. We did not have a huge overhang of surplus housing. We had a history of people trading in land. As a consequence we had multiple debt portfolios around certain areas of land. One could see those debt portfolios increasing around the same land holdings because those lands were being traded-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
How many times a year did the Northern Ireland advisory committee meet? How did those meetings go? Will Mr. Rowntree talk us through the structure? What was discussed at a typical meeting? What type of meeting was typical?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
They were very regulated environments. They were very formal, with agendas set by the chairperson. There were very carefully controlled discussions in the room. We had meetings that gave rise to discussions about whether they were proceeding to put a portfolio into administration or were considering the administration of certain aspects of the portfolio. They would give us that information. They would not name the debtor but they would say they were moving on certain aspects of the portfolio that could have an impact on Northern Ireland. We discussed issues around the valuation of lands. These were not specific valuations but how land in general was moving in Northern Ireland and whether there had been any considered uptake in interest in lands in Northern Ireland. We looked at the aspects of commercial, industrial and residential in broad terms, not in key, specific terms. Meetings tended to last between two and two and a half hours.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Two and a half hours. I want to get to a part of Mr. Rowntree's speech where he talks about conflicts of interest or individual conflicts of interest. In his opening statement, Mr. Rowntree said, "At the NAMA Northern Ireland advisory committee meetings we were not made aware of direct or perceived individual conflicts of interest matters as noted by individual members".
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
He went on to say a declaration of conflicts that is noted in writing at the start of each meeting by each person attending. How does that work in practice?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did this happen as members were sitting at the meeting or was it-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was at the start of each meeting. So members filled in this declaration and gave it to whom?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree had his own personal register of interest that he updated on a regular basis as well.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What is that? Is it electronic format or a file?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was personal to each individual.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What I am taking from what Mr. Rowntree is saying is that he filled in his declaration of conflict of interest if there was any. It was done by Mr. Rowntree.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was handed to somebody, through the chair, who had control of it but Mr. Rowntree was not aware of other people's declarations.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Does Mr. Rowntree think that is appropriate?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Will Mr. Rowntree expand on what he means by that?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I accept what Mr. Rowntree says to the effect that conflicts of interest should be an open book. In a "Spotlight" programme shown on 29 February 2016, he said, "It would be fair to say that the information that I witnessed and I heard in NAMA offered commercial opportunity." When he was asked by the presenter, "How valuable would that information have been to a bidder on the Northern Ireland NAMA portfolio?", Mr. Rowntree went on to say, "What I would say was that information that we discussed of a commercially sensitive nature in my view would have added some value to their made application because it would have given them some steer on a [strategic] capacity to work out that overall portfolio."
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Given that one of Mr. Rowntree's colleagues had an association with six debtors, who made up 50% of the loan book, and that Mr. Rowntree sat at the meetings with this same individual and given what he just said about the declared conflicts of interest, does he feel a bit let down that the information was not shared with him and others who sat at those meetings?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When we now know that-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am not asking Mr. Rowntree to comment on the behaviour of any individual but on what is now accepted and acknowledged. We had the Minister here last week who was also made aware of conflicts of interest and, as Mr. Rowntree knows, we have the report from the Comptroller and Auditor General which also talks about the conflicts of interest. I will get to those in a few minutes. It has been established that there was a relationship between one of the external board members and six - possibly seven - debtors. That information was disclosed. It says it was disclosed.
Can we display executive summary No. 54 on page 17 of the Special Report No. 94 of the Comptroller and Auditor General? Is that possible?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes, it is on its way.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Will Mr. Rowntree bear with me? I want to be specific.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is executive summary No. 54. "During NIAC meetings and in annual statements of interests, one external NIAC member, Mr Frank Cushnahan, declared his involvement as an advisor, mainly on a non-fee basis, to six NAMA debtors and to a third party". It goes on to say that when the Comptroller and Auditor General's examination team looked at this, it was estimated that the loans of the six debtors represented about half the value of the Northern Ireland loan book.
It says that during NIAC meetings and annual statements of interest, one external member declared his involvement as an adviser. I assume when he did this it was the piece of paper Mr. Rowntree was talking about, but he was not made aware of that.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Those were personal disclosures. Conflicts of interest are a personal declaration. It behoves anyone in public life to acknowledge whether he or she has an actual or perceived conflict of interest in respect of any matter that is both actionable in the meeting or potentially a matter of subject under review by the organisation so it must be declared.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It states here that Mr. Cushnahan did declare an interest in respect of a relationship with six debtors. There may not have been sufficient examination of what that meant but the declaration was made. In the "Spotlight" programme, Mr. Rowntree said there was commercially sensitive information that would be of value to an overall portfolio and that there were things that he witnessed and heard in NAMA that would have offered commercial opportunity. I am trying to put myself in Mr. Rowntree's shoes. If I was a member of the NIAC and was involved in discussions at whatever level or however sensitive and one of the people I was sitting next to had the same position as Mr. Rowntree and had a relationship with debtors that made up 50% of the loan portfolio that I was not made aware of, I would feel personally let down. I am not asking Mr. Rowntree to comment on an individual's behaviour but I am asking if he feels let down because the information was not shared with him. Does he believe it should have been shared with him?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
My first knowledge of that was when I read the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General. It is a decision of the NAMA board how to make available those conflict of interest issues. They are personal declarations and need the permission of the persons who have declared them to share them. Whenever I made the statement to "Spotlight" I was not aware of the declarations. I was talking about another matter that is contained within my statement here today.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Is it not extraordinary that Mr. Rowntree was not made aware of any of this as a member of the board? I am trying to get at the process. We want to establish whether the processes within NAMA were robust enough to withstand potential breaches of process. When there is a conflict of interest and when a conflict of interest arises, we must make sure in every organisation that there are best and robust practices in place. It does not seem to have been the case in this situation because it is now established there were conflicts of interest. The Minister for Finance in the South was here last week and he said he accepted the process had become corrupted. That aside, surely Mr. Rowntree must have a view as a former member of the NIAC of whether the process was robust enough in respect of declarations of interest.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Does Mr. Rowntree believe that was the right thing to do?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It is not best practice from my perspective as an experienced chairperson at senior level. It is not what I would see as open book provision. This is a very commercially sensitive organisation and the declarations belonging to the individual are personal and must be respected. Therefore, a decision was taken to respect and not to share; otherwise, I presume it would have been shared with us.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree for his honesty. I want to deal with a related point before coming back to that substantive point. He spoke in his opening statement about being subject to regular training and update discussions on governance. What does he mean by regular training and what did that involve?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Who carried out that training?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
How many times a year was that done?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Were the two external board members part of that?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Everybody would have been very aware of their responsibilities.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Absolutely. I can honestly say, hand on heart, no one associated with the NAMA provision would not have understood the robustness of the governance framework they were trying to put in place.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
If Mr. Rowntree had an association with six debtors who made up 50% of the Project Eagle loan portfolio, he would have known that was a conflict of interest and a problem.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree would have resigned?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When NAMA became aware of that, and at some point it was made aware, does Mr. Rowntree believe that a sufficient course of action was taken? The Comptroller and Auditor General was quite critical of how it dealt with this-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I know that is a decision for NAMA. I was just trying to get Mr. Rowntree's view as a former NIAC member.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I cannot really speak for the main NAMA board. The one question I would retort with is: did the main NAMA board share declarations of interest belonging to each individual board member as well? Were those made public? Were they a matter of public record? If there is a governance provision that controls declarations of interest that run through the spinal cord of the organisation, that has to be respected throughout the whole organisation.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree is saying that the same process could have been applied in terms of the declarations being made by way of paperwork before meetings. That possibly was applied at board level too.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Correct. I would hope they were consistent in their process of applying to the NIAC as much as the main NAMA board.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We do not know that but we will ask NAMA and get clarification. That is an interesting point.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree made another important and honest point in his opening statement, "It is important that the allegations surrounding the Project Eagle sale are investigated in full" - we all accept that - "and that any such investigations look also at the corporate governance controls, both executive and non-executive, surrounding the bid process".
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What does Mr. Rowntree mean by "corporate governance controls"?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I read the Comptroller and Auditor General's report. It was a best value study. The scope and terms of reference are limited in that regard. To have an all embracing report, one needs to consider the governance framework surrounding the bid process. This was a bid that emerged from an approach to NAMA in the early stages. There was not a collective decision to go out to an invitation to tender for bidders and run a short list and do the necessary provisions. In a sense, it is defending a different position. It requires examining the corporate governance provisions that surrounded the overall exercise internal to the board, internal to the executive team and external to those in the process.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Why would Mr. Rowntree say the investigation should also consider the corporate governance controls? That would suggest he sees something there that needs to be investigated?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is about the conflict of interest.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Can Mr. Rowntree elaborate on that?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
If the allegations imply that someone stood outside their terms of reference as a committee member, that is way beyond conflict of interest. If the allegation implies that someone stood outside their terms of reference and went further by offering some added value to a bidding process, that is also outside conflict of interest. Those are corporate governance provisions and need to be included in a consolidated and corporate report, independently controlled and verified.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
He went on to say, "It is important that integrity is the key principle in any such investigations and any confirmed breach of integrity must have supporting accountability and sanction".
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What does Mr. Rowntree mean by integrity?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think all of us in this room understand the value of integrity. It is the spinal cord. When I read the article published on 2 July, naming me as a person who had absolutely nothing to do with this, I was quite furious, as anyone would be. I was also furious that these allegations have emerged because we should be able to defend this position. We should have robust------
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Does he believe that people associated with NAMA, or any individual associated with NAMA, did not show integrity or breached integrity?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
No. I think that has to be confirmed. That is why I said I fully support an investigation that will get to the truth and the facts of this issue because we do not want to run an investigation that examines allegations and assumptions.
We need an investigation that comes up with facts, and the facts themselves must be evidenced and based on the truth of the situation.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We have the facts on Mr. Cushnahan. The Comptroller and Auditor General's report actually is evidence based. It took a number of years to publish and to investigate this report. It looked at supporting documentation, minutes of the Northern Ireland advisory committee, NIAC, and NAMA and involved a lot of discussion with NAMA officials. It is based on fact. What we do know from the Comptroller and Auditor General's report, and this has been confirmed by NAMA chairman, Mr. Daly, is that he became aware not just of the relationship between Mr. Cushnahan and debtors he became aware of what has become known as success fees. These success fees were with PIMCO. They were in three parts, one for Brown Rudnick, one for Tughans and one for Mr. Cushnahan. We are also aware, from paragraph 55 in the Comptroller and Auditor General's report, of the relationship that Mr. Cushnahan had with Tughans, that he shared its premises and that there were two NIAC meetings there. Did Mr. Rowntree attend those two NIAC meetings?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was Mr. Rowntree aware at that point that Mr. Cushnahan-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was Mr. Rowntree aware-----
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think he extended the invitation to us at the previous meeting to attend and use the premises. That was taken up by the executive team. The committee had no decision-making power. The decision to locate the meeting there was a matter for the executive team of NAMA.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We now know there was a success fee or fixer fee, call what you like, of £15 million, which was to be shared between Mr. Cushnahan, Tughans and Brown Rudnick. This has been accepted now as a potentially corrupted process by the Minister also. That led to PIMCO eventually withdrawing. How does that make Mr. Rowntree feel as a former board member?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I was surprised and shocked. I would like a report way beyond what the Comptroller and Auditor General has done. He has produced a best value report. We now need a consolidated corporate governance report that looks at issues of breach of corporate governance. In my statement I also said this needs to be supported by an accountability framework and supporting sanctions. If those breaches of corporate governance are sufficient to look at any other issues that need to be called into question by this committee or the main NAMA board, we need an evidence base to go forward.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When did those two NIAC meetings take place in Tughans office?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Then Mr. Rowntree would have been very surprised when he was eventually made aware. NAMA was made aware by PIMCO on 10 March 2014 of the success fee that involved Mr. Cushnahan, Brown Rudnick and Tughans, but Mr. Rowntree was not made aware of this. The first he heard of it was when it was in the public domain.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will move on to the next questioner.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
To come back to corporate governance, in Mr. Rowntree's opening statement he said that NAMA as an organisation put in place a robust corporate governance framework. Is this method not at odds with the fact somebody on an advisory committee could operate for six debtors? Does this not show a flaw in corporate governance? Mr. Rowntree said he would not have sat on the committee.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So it is a very strong conflict.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
In answer to the Deputy's question, if I may, I believe NAMA made every best effort to put in place a robust corporate governance framework. I believe the appointment of someone with those levels of conflict, perceived or real, whatever we want to call them, does make it more difficult for that person to manage the relationship within the committee and it makes it more difficult for the committee itself to manage its relationship with the person and the information control therein. It is back to the original appointment.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In a good corporate governance situation, if those interests were declared would they not have almost automatically excluded the person on the basis of the conflict of interest?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
The terms of reference for the appointment are outside of the corporate governance provisions. The corporate governance provisions kick in when the person is appointed. The terms of reference for the appointment themselves maybe should have excluded that, if it was worthy of consideration.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
To go back to the point made and expand on it little, with reference to page 17 of the review of the Northern Ireland Assembly Committee for Finance and Personnel of the sale of NAMA properties in Northern Ireland and the paragraph referenced earlier, which states the committee also noted from the BBC Northern Ireland "Spotlight" programme that Mr. Brian Rowntree stated:
...that the NIAC members had access to information which was of a ‘commercially sensitive nature’ and which offered ‘commercial opportunity’ and would have been of some value to a bidder for Project Eagle. This is of particular significance as it appears to contradict the position adopted by NAMA to date.
What was the nature of the information? Much of what Mr. Rowntree stated in his opening statement tended to say there was a lot of general information.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What was the nature of the information that would have given somebody that commercial opportunity?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I would not have made that statement on "Spotlight" if I had not affirmed that I was in a room where I had discussions around commercially sensitive information. I would not have gone public by stating that on a BBC "Spotlight" programme. This refers to a piece of work which was evidence based work undertaken by a university doing land assembly analysis. Before it would even undertake or engage with NAMA it had a series of caveats around confidentiality of the information. These were explained to the committee. If this is not commercially sensitive I do not know what is. This data was not only location and type of properties, this data also had the details of planning permissions which were current, about to expire and the potential for renewal. It also had details of housing and residential needs overlaid on top of it. It also had details in consolidated form of holdings by other banks. One would have got a picture of the complete landbank available in Northern Ireland and one would have looked at the opportunity locations within this portfolio.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Were some of these properties with loans in NAMA? I presume they were.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would it have been identified that they were properties with a NAMA loan attached?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I want to refer to page 132 of the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General. At the end of the page it states:
With regard to the proposed acquisition of the NI Debtors Portfolio, PIMCO confirmed the following:They have not completed any due diligence or engaged directly with any NAMA debtors in this regard;
PIMCO’s analysis was conducted by way of reverse engineering NAMA’s Balance Sheet and cross-referencing the publicly available information on NAMA’s portfolio;
I am curious because this is jumping out at me. Could NAMA have put together that portfolio? Was it credible? Is it believable that PIMCO would be able to put together a portfolio with reverse engineering on NAMA's balance sheet and cross-referencing, or does it indicate there was other information?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I cannot comment. I was not part of the discussions with the main board. What it says to me is that it had some process outlined as reverse engineering NAMA's balance sheet, so it had to have some underpinning intelligence, be it some intelligence itself or evidence based, to look at a reverse engineering component.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am looking at when the approach appears to have come almost packaged to NAMA via the two finance Ministers. It looks to me - if I am reading it correctly - as though there was a significant amount of information in advance of engagement with NAMA in putting together this portfolio. Would that be how Mr. Rowntree would read it?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I have never known anyone to bid for any business opportunity blind. I do not know what its evidence base was. I believe that is where we go back to the controls and the corporate governance provisions that would outline and underpin the evidence provisions that supported the bid process.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay, was the university undertaking that-----
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would the University of Ulster have valued the assets or would it have given an indication?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I do not think the values were critical in this because what was being looked at was the opportunity. The report was about looking forward, not about looking back. The report looked at the identification of potential and looking at how value could be added to Northern Ireland's balance sheet in developing out these opportunities. There was significant investment by NAMA and other banks in looking at moving forward the landbank, the opportunity sites and the void properties. Suddenly, we had a change of direction which was to really have a fire sale of the loan book, as opposed to a working out arrangements on the opportunity sites.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Can the witness indicate when the work was completed by the university?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Obviously Mr. Rowntree was aware of the terms of reference for NAMA for an open process and getting the best return for taxpayers etc.-----
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
He says in his statement that he was updated on the original interest expressed by PIMCO. Was Mr. Rowntree surprised that what was being proposed was a deviation and that it was going to be a one-bidder process?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Right.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
There was no strategic discussion around moving the complete loan book out of Northern Ireland, that was completely offside. It was discussion that was ring-fenced by the main board and it took it forward. It was then suddenly removed from the Northern Ireland advisory committee.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When Mr. Rowntree states that he was updated on the interest expressed by PIMCO, was PIMCO named at that stage?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was it fairly soon after that when the information would have become available from the university?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That completes my queries, I will leave it there. I thank the witness.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I appreciate that Mr. Rowntree is appearing before the committee and I thank him for giving his time. Can he clarify why he offered to go on the advisory board?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I applied to go on the main NAMA board. I responded to an open competition. I thought I had the skills, expertise and knowledge that would support-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So Mr. Rowntree got the second division gig?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was Mr. Rowntree disappointed?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Why did Mr. Rowntree want to go on the main board?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I had a primary interest in housing. I was the then chairman of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive, the largest social housing landlord in western Europe. I thought there was a situation here where I could foresee where we are today and the issues that were going to emerge. It must be remembered that where one has lands that are bogged down financially and in terms of capacity, to roll those out is not a five-year plan - once it becomes stagnated it is a ten to 15-year plan. I thought that here was an opportunity to look at something where we could match commercial and industrial opportunities while also looking at giving some capacity and some enhanced initiative around residential.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So the witness felt he could add value to it?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On behalf of NAMA, on behalf of the people?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On behalf of NAMA or on behalf of people in Northern Ireland, or both?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree has said that when he was provided with information he would not have been provided with debtors' details. He was provided with other forms of information with regard to the debtors, but not the detail of who they were.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I want to tease this out a bit. Northern Ireland is not that big a place. I am intrigued as to the type of information that was discussed. If one looks at the type of information, and if it was just all generic, broad-stroke discussions on the strategic future of how this would impact on Northern Ireland, I do not know if there would be any need for many meetings. I am intrigued at the level of detail here because whatever detail was discussed, and if it was fairly generic that is fine, but in Northern Ireland it would require only a small bit of detail to identify what people were talking about.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I know, that is my point.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
If a person sneezes in Connacht then someone in Muster knows. That is just the way it is. But what must be respected is the corporacy of that room and to make sure one is not engaging in discussions with those who can benefit from those details. There were only three or four meetings per year, maximum. We had reference to the programme of Government in Northern Ireland, the impact of available funds from Government in Northern Ireland, the impact of banking capital in Northern Ireland and the downturn in the housing and commercial property market. We had high-level strategic discussions, which were informing the direction of travel about the loan book. The majority of people on that committee were not from Northern Ireland and part of our time was spent in educating those people as well.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Frankly speaking, the advisory board would not discuss debtors-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----but would discuss the possibility of certain loans being dealt with?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What level of detail would be given?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was Mr. Rowntree ever able to identify who these debtors were?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
You would be able to identify them.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Yes, but in fairness to NAMA it never went into the detail but if certain corporate entities were mentioned then one would have an a idea who they were.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So Mr. Rowntree would know in advance, even though-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Even though they did not-----
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The witness was able to make up the jigsaw?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay, that is interesting. Mr. Rowntree said in his opening statement that the Northern Ireland Executive was informed. How did that work?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
After a number of the NAMA meetings in Northern Ireland, the chairperson and the senior executive, the person representing the Executive team, along with anybody who wanted to attend, met with the Finance Minster and gave him a briefing on what was happening. Without going into too much detail, they gave him a briefing on where the key considerations were in relation to NAMA's anticipated actions in Northern Ireland and to reassure that there was no intention of fire sale. This aspect of fire sale kept coming up on a regular basis.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is my next question. I am intrigued by the fact that meetings took place subsequent to the NIAC meetings.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Were they with the Minister for Finance directly?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
They were with the Minister for Finance and his officials.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would these meetings happen after each NIAC meeting?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We must find out the detail of those. I take it there were no details on them.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Who goes to these meetings?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did the NIAC add value or was it just a talking shop?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I can decode that point rather easily. There was a volte-face over the question of a fire sale. There were serious concerns after the meeting with the Minister for Finance on this question but then it was decided that the whole lot was to go at once. How did that make Mr. Rowntree feel?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I was surprised and I am still surprised to this day. I respected the decision of the main NAMA board, however. We were not a decision-making forum and we were told that a decision had been made to sell the loan book.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It effectively said that the whole strategy of avoiding a fire sale in Northern Ireland, because of concerns over the impact on the market, was to be changed.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It must have come as a complete shock to the committee that, after all the discussions and analysis, everything it had tried to ensure did not happen then happened in one go.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
The original discussions were about the fire sale of the assets. The conversation quickly went into banking terms in respect of the loan book and the sale of the loan book itself. Its assets and the securitisation of assets in support of the loans were no longer matters for debate. The debate was on selling the loan book. The work the University of Ulster did was around the assets. The NAMA board must have some note in the minutes of its discussions about the change of heart in Northern Ireland, from an emphasis on a controlled and strategic platform to deal with the asset book to one dealing with the sale of the complete loan book.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Having been on the NIAC, Mr. Rowntree's assessment is that there must have been a change of direction at board level in NAMA.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would it be fair to say that, once an offer came in, it changed their view?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In the "Spotlight" programme, Mr. Rowntree said the the data provided by the university would have created commercial value if they were made public.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree feel that, if the information were to have got to any individuals or groups considering buying loans, it would have been of some aid to them?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was something Mr. Rowntree rated highly.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I called for this. I asked at committee for an evidence-based report. At the Northern Ireland committee, we discussed it and were informed by NAMA that it did not have any supporting evidence for the Republic of Ireland asset book. We wanted to advance this for Northern Ireland.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree requested this.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
This substantial and high-quality document was brought to the NIAC with a lot of confidentiality attached. Then the intentions of NAMA, as regards Northern Ireland, changed.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What was the length of time between the information coming to the NIAC and PIMCO's original answer?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The NIAC requested the document and received it. Subsequently, NAMA changed course and decided on a sale process in which it was all to happen in one go.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could it be that it informed the decision of a purchaser?
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am not assuming that at all, but this information is valuable.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
As I said on "Spotlight", this information had commercial capacity and if the board of NAMA was informed of it, its members would understand its commercial capacity.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
If a purchaser had this information he or she would be in a better position to put together an offer for the loan book.
Alan Kelly (Tipperary, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I appreciate Mr. Rowntree's honesty. Thank you.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will take up where the last speaker left off on the report from the University of Ulster. Can Mr. Rowntree repeat what he just said?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
If I was conducting a due diligence exercise on behalf of an intended buyer, and I had the capacity to acquire that document, I would be smiling. It would give me a clear indication as to the potential of the landbank, not just for my loans but for other loans. A lot of these loans were what were known as "cocktail" loans which meant they had supporting loans from other banks.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
If that information was made available to another member of the committee, or to PIMCO or Cerberus, in the form of a photocopy or photograph, it would be very helpful information to have.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was the report ever published?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is not available.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
How many people would have had sight of the document?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
The Northern Ireland Advisory Committee and the board of NAMA would have had sight of it.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would everyone on the Northern Ireland Advisory Committee have had sight of it?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree means money was applied.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay. Mr. Rowntree said that he asked for this report.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It contained a vision with a long-term view as to how to use the NAMA loans in Northern Ireland. Is that right?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Yes. I have experience in land assembly, in moving residential housing platforms forward. These would not be done on a three-year cycle, but on a five to 15-year cycle in the main - five-year short-term provisions for immediacy and 15 to 20 years for longer-term provisions. This is effectively about the capacity for people to live. A mapping exercise of that nature gives an indication as to where the need is and how that can be mapped over what is available. If lands are not available, the need has to be displaced somewhere else. That is the reality of it.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Where was that report discussed? Was it discussed at Mr. Rowntree's committee's meetings?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It was discussed at the Northern Ireland advisory committee, NIAC, and people from the University of Ulster came in and made PowerPoint presentations to us. To go back to the confidentiality issue, for the University of Ulster to acquire the data from other lenders, it had to have express confidentiality agreements in place before that information was released. Whenever a person says that there was no confidential information at the committee, the Deputy understands the remarks I made on the "Spotlight" and my remarks today. If that is not confidential, I do not know what is.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Right. There were 20 committee meetings.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes. I have looked at the minutes and the University of Ulster report does not jump out, but perhaps I missed it.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It does not jump out.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Two of those were held in Tughans and, as Mr. Rowntree said, and one took place in April.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
One was on 22 April and the last one before Mr. Cushnahan departed was on 7 October 2013.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
To go back to the issue of governance, Mr. Rowntree said he was impressed to a certain extent with the governance in place.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The first meeting of his committee took place on 12 May.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There was a paragraph on conflicts, lobbying, confidential information and so on. It was noted that any and all information to the committee was confidential.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That meeting was held in May and the next one was held in July during which there was a question about whether section 202 of the NAMA Act regarding confidential information applies? Would Mr. Rowntree remember that at this point?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What does Mr. Rowntree remember about that discussion?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There was not clarity for the first few meetings as to-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In regard to confidentiality.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was stated that section 202 therefore applies to all members of the committee, including external members.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That was the feeling at that point.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
They were looking at this again in September and there was confusion about it and they were going to seek legal advice. It was requested that clarification from an external adviser be sought in regard to the application of section 202 of the NAMA Act.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The only point I am making there is that almost from May onwards up to November, there was a question over whether section 202 applied.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
No, Mr. Rowntree did not, but in regard to governance there was no clarity as to what applied.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
All right.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
They were trying to sort that out.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In regard to Mr. Rowntree's conflicts of interest, he declared twice in these 20 meetings.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Will Mr. Rowntree us what the procedure was when he declared, because it is not clear to me. It clearly stated that he declared.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What would have happened then at the meeting? Would Mr. Rowntree have left the meeting if somebody-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
If it did conflict, would Mr. Rowntree have left the room?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Can Mr. Rowntree remember if Mr. Cushnahan ever left the room in regard to a matter?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Never.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Although there are about five or six disclosures by Mr. Cushnahan, he never left the room, even though-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Never. Although now we know that he represented six debtors and a seventh debtor in regard to-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
To return to the University of Ulster report again, which is a key piece of evidence today that has emerged in regard to it, it was commissioned by NAMA, it was paid for or-----
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It was partly commissioned by NAMA. It was commissioned by other banks as well; other banks were involved in this.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It had a long-term vision on what to do with these properties on a sustainable basis.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Why was it not published then?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It would also perhaps have informed NAMA policy.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Absolutely, if I was in a senior position in NAMA, I would have loved to have been able to take this document and work through it.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Accepting that document and the vision, did it recommend a selling off of the property in Northern Ireland?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
No. What it looked at was the market for certain house types, certain commercial property types and location with respect to need. In terms of the position here in Ireland and then the reflection on Northern Ireland, it was a continuation of east coast strategy - the activity streams along the east cost.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is a crucial document looking at strategic development.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
If one is trying to manage a land portfolio, primarily that is what it was in Northern Ireland, one needs an evidence base to support one as to what those lands are, where they are located, the potential for those lands and, most importantly, the anticipated interest in those lands.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree say that we did not have that in the Republic?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There was nothing to compare it with in the South.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree was one of two external members, is that right?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree never had a query about holding the meetings in Tughans?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree was not aware of any-----
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Absolutely. Wherever they told us to meet, we met. I remember suggesting at one stage that maybe we could meet in a certain hotel as it had good parking facilities, which was quite selfish of me, but I was told "No, that would be associated to some debtor". I was told that was not a runner.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
They were particularly sensitive in regard to that matter.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When Mr. Rowntree gave that response I smiled at the thought of NAMA being in a property for several years of one of its biggest debtors. I find that funny in terms of its head office.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The same sensitivity was not apparent in regard to Tughans.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree has said this strategic change came suddenly.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I preface that by saying one of the points the Comptroller and Auditor General made in his report was that there was a turnabout. He was not commenting on whether that is right or wrong, but he did not see any evidence justifying that strategic change. Is Mr. Rowntree saying something similar now?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Total agreement.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Cushnahan resigned in November 2013.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The last meeting had been held in Tughans' premises in October and then he gave in his resignation. Was it ever discussed as to why he resigned or what reason was given?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
For personal reasons.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Then Mr. Rowntree continued on as the one external member.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There is correspondence here that they were going to replace Mr. Cushnahan but that never happened.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was it ever discussed why he was not replaced?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When did Mr. Rowntree learn about the success fee?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Regarding the sales process, from which PIMCO has withdrawn, was Mr. Rowntree aware of all of that?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On 13 October.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay. I will put a hypothetical question to Mr. Rowntree in terms of his role as a member of the advisory committee, which he probably cannot really answer.
If Mr. Rowntree had become aware of a success fee, how would he have dealt with the issue?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would Mr. Rowntree have gone to the police?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree made a reference to the report of the University of Ulster which had been commissioned by NAMA and other banks. It was not a project commissioned by NAMA.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
No; it was a joint report by Ulster Bank - eventually Northern Bank - Santander and, I think, Nationwide. It was a consolidated report to give credit on where the consolidated corporate loan book stood in Northern Ireland. As Deputy Alan Kelly said, Northern Ireland is a village. In many ways, therefore, the loan book and the risk were shared with other banks.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree received a presentation-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree receive copies of the report to take away?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On the work done by the University of Ulster with NAMA and the other banks, is that how 50% of the assets or loans were outside Northern Ireland? It would not have included any of that information, or would it?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree for being here and giving very valuable and helpful information. The University of Ulster project was called the Ulster University Jordanstown land development model. It was not a one-off escapade by the university but a detailed, elaborate process which involved NAMA and other banks, as Mr. Rowntree set out.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The work was financially supported, as agreed by the main board, to the value of £20,000.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree has set out how the Northern Ireland advisory committee received regular updates. It is also fair to say the main board was equally informed of the development of the work.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The records reflect that fact.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Perhaps refreshingly in terms of most of our witnesses to date, Mr. Rowntree attaches a very high premium to evidence-based approaches.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I have chaired several senior public bodies and you cannot allow your board to make decisions blind because they will come back to haunt you. One needs an evidence base to stand over the robustness of the decision making process and, more importantly, the validity of the need for the decision to be made.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did the evidence available to Mr. Rowntree as a committee member, perhaps not least through the University of Ulster study, suggest there was significant scope and strategic space in respect of the assets held in Northern Ireland? I get the sense that Mr. Rowntree could see a shape or a pathway forward in the use and disposal of the assets.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
We saw an east-west divide primarily, as one would have expected. We saw a rural and heavy urban divide. I ensured, through the Northern Ireland Housing Executive, that we gave our housing need studies and we laid the data over them. This really gives the capacity in terms of residential property and shows hot spots and hot spot activity. Lenders want to ensure maximisation but also immediacy of return on their spend. Therefore, in many ways they want to locate their spend around hot spots. The data identified these hot spots but they also showed, if one spread it out, where one could displace some of the demand to other areas to give regeneration capacity in other regions. This would have an impact on public transport provision, private sector development, commercial activity, etc. There are also lands which are more difficult, if not impossible, to develop. In commercial terms, in its entirety, one must ask what compensating loss one is prepared to bear on the non-development lands and the premium one would pay for the development portion.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
From this contribution, the committee gets some of the shape and contours of the discussions that would have taken place at the Northern Ireland advisory committee.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It goes back to what Deputy Alan Kelly said. I did not want to join a committee that was dealing with the operational issues of NAMA and the businesses cases. NAMA employs hundreds of staff, hundreds of fellow accountants sitting in a room looking at business cases. It is not a good use of anybody's time to sit in a committee discussing debtor portfolios.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will come to that issue.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In the light of this, was it wise to bundle the assets in the North and sell them in one lot? Is that the call Mr. Rowntree would have made?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am not asking Mr. Rowntree to second guess the main board.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I did not have the evidence base in front of me to make that final call. Even the Comptroller and Auditor General has examined the calculations and underpinning valuations to which they worked. I would have asked whether it was about the assets or the loan book. The decision was about selling the loan book.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am coming to that issue. It is the most significant point Mr. Rowntree has made today. He is not going to give me a view, as a person who had access to the study. The records reflect what he said, that he overlaid the Northern Ireland Housing Executive data. He had a deep look at the assets and what was available in the North, mindful of the concerns about fire sales. Had he been in charge-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree does not accept Mr. Frank Daly's description of the Northern Ireland housing committee as a talking shop.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I know; we hear that. When Mr. Rowntree became a member of the committee, was his role to consider the assets in the North, for example, a hotel in Lurgan or a shopping centre in Belfast? Was that his focus?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On the terms of reference of the committee-----
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
We were very much aware that NAMA did not own the assets but controlled the loans. However, as I said in my opening remarks, by controlling the loans, one de factohas control of the assets.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree made a most insightful set of remarks on the Project Eagle decision because we have fallen into this, even on this committee, by saying the Northern assets got bundled and sold. In fact, that is not what happened. The Northern debtors-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----were bundled.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As we have reflected, 50% of the assets were not in fact in the North at all. There was 17% in Scotland.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
And so on.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Obviously, as the Northern committee, it stands to reason that it was not considering properties in the outer Hebrides in its deliberations.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Who is to know, Mr. Rowntree? Perhaps in another life.
So PIMCO makes the approach, not on the basis of the Northern assets, but the Northern debtors. In fact, one has two strategic shifts. Is that correct?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
One has a shift in terms of Northern assets - what to do, deal with them singularly, work them our or sell them in a collective way. Shift number two is not about the assets in the first instance, it is actually about the debtors.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think underpinning that is that in the initial thinking of the committee, and I presume the main board and the senior executive team of NAMA, their rationale would have been the only way out of this is to work out the asset base. Then offside comes this approach which says set aside the asset base and let us look at the loan book.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes. Mr. Rowntree has given evidence here today that he had no prior indication, inkling or discussion that such a manoeuvre was about to happen.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It came at him sideways.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree is a very experienced person.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Am I correct to say that Mr. Rowntree is an accountant by profession?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
How does it sit with him professionally that such a fundamental set of changes would be made with such scant records, if any, to reflect discussion, analysis and evaluation? I ask him for his professional view on that.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Without giving a professional view, let me look at this not as an accountant and not even as a housing person but let me look at this as a person who has a history of public service and a history of social intervention. Here we were where we had literally a meltdown in the financial circles in 2008 and we were on a very slow path of recovery. We were working on how to bring some added value to society, how do we remove the continued dependency on the public sector to pick up this tab and pick up this intervention required as a result of the financial collapse. I think that what we saw was some strategic discussions around Northern Ireland and how we might do something successful, and how we even might engage. Yes, it would be a slow burn and there is no doubt about that but I think if one could have gained momentum, then things could have emerged. Suddenly we had a discussion which was then around, we have an approach on the loan book and we are getting rid of the loan book. The assets and the work through of those assets and the added value to the community and society really is not our concern.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
NAMA is bound by the NAMA Act.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It must get value for money for the taxpayer and expeditiously deal with the assets. There is also that piece in it around social dividend as well.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Presumably Mr. Rowntree was conscious of that.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Let me bring Mr. Rowntree back to another point that has occurred to me. Given the fact the strategy was to bundle debtors, which captured a lot of assets in the North, and then reflecting again on the conflict of interest that Mr. Cushnahan had - Mr. Cushnahan had a relationship and this is a matter of fact, so I am not asking Mr. Rowntree to speculate - with seven debtors, does that not mean the scenario becomes all the more problematic in respect of a conflict of interest?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think that those are matters for NAMA to comment on. I was a member of the committee. The regulatory provisions that surround the committee are in the control of NAMA and the requirements to behave within the code of conduct, and with the provisions of good corporate governance, relate to each individual member.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
And fall to them. Did Mr. Rowntree know about the fixers' fees or the success fees, which is his stated position?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I accept that and we have that now as a matter of record. Does Mr. Rowntree think that he should have known?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think that as a member of the committee if there had to have been any indication that there was something wrong in the PIMCO approach, since we were advised as a committee at the very early stages on the approach from PIMCO, if the PIMCO approach had to have been set aside it might have been good governance to update us as to why it was set aside.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
But that did not happen.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So there were not consistent in their approach.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree know that Cerberus had stepped in?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree had notice of the finalisation of the deal at the eleventh hour, as I said.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It strikes me as very strange behaviour from the chairman of a committee with whom Mr. Rowntree had worked for a considerable length of time at that stage.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think that it is good governance in many ways in the way Frank Daly acted. Total control of this rested with the main NAMA board and then he also was respecting those governance provisions by retaining that within the board's structure. I respected that. I would not have expected Frank Daly to do anything other than adhere to those good governance provisions.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Very often when these matters have been discussed, Mr. Rowntree, the assertion has been made that Project Eagle and all of the controversy associated with it is "a Northern matter." I take from Mr. Rowntree's evidence a very clear statement that control, decision-making and ultimately responsibility was vested in the board of NAMA, which was located not in Belfast but in Dublin.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Yes. Let me take the Deputy back on that, if I may. The original terms of reference, which Deputy Connolly referred to, indicate that this was not a decision-making forum. It clearly set that down. The decisions were made by the main NAMA board.
In relation to Project Eagle, it is very clear, and even the minutes give testament to this, that the control and responsibility for that process rested with the main NAMA board, and within the senior ranks of the executive team supporting the board. The decision was then taken by the main NAMA board to set aside any discussion on Project Eagle with the Northern Ireland advisory committee. I would go as far to say, therefore, that the committee itself is removed then at that point from the sale of Project Eagle because there is no reference to anything in relation to Project Eagle thereafter. One has to then go to the main NAMA board to seek resolution of the considerations that are under review by this committee and by others.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
NAMA contends that if there were problems, and we know there were clearly governance failures and matters more serious that are not for this committee in respect of this transaction, that the problems resided exclusively on the part of the buyer and not on the part of the seller. I do not wish to put words in Mr. Rowntree's mouth but from his testimony today I think that he raised questions at least in respect of that NAMA position.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
All I would say in response to that is I am sure that whenever this situation arose, and there were concerns acknowledged around the process, I am sure matters were referred internally to the NAMA audit committee - its own audit committee. I am sure that audit committee had the good grace and the benefit of legal opinion to support its views on it. I am sure then the movement forward by the board, in concluding the deal, was supported by some evidence base that said that this all is in order on our side of the equation.
In any transaction, like buying a house, there are two parties to the transaction - the buyer and the seller. Both have to have legal cover.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree was working on the assumption, which is not unreasonable, that the decisions made in respect of what transpired around PIMCO and the decision to carry on would be informed by a view of the audit committee and legal opinion. Would that be his expectation?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Nearly every question I was going to pose has already been asked so I will only touch on them again. I compliment Mr. Rowntree on his precise knowledge of Northern Ireland. It is obvious from his presentation that his major concern was about keeping the economy in Northern Ireland going or improving it.
Mr. Rowntree mentioned a fire sale. Was his reason for going on the NIAC that he did not want fire sales or quick sales that could do damage to the economy in Northern Ireland?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
If we look at this in its more plural context, the discussion took place at the early stages of the committee - at the first two meetings. It was not just NAMA selling land; there were other banks that had land portfolios, particularly Ulster Bank, which had a sizeable exposure in terms of the debt. We then had public sector lands that were being sold as part of the programme for Government. What would the impact be of a fire sale from NAMA which was probably a 30% or 35% stakeholder in the lands that were securitised against loans? What impact would that have had across the piece? It would have done nothing but drive down the value of lands; that is the first thing. It also might have stagnated sales for a long time. So the potential would have been removed from the equation.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As has been explained already, the loan book was sold off instead of the assets. We have questioned representatives of NAMA and others. Does Mr. Rowntree believe that instead of selling the loan book in one big lump, it would have been better to sell the assets over four or five years? Would more money have been realised in the long term if it had been done gradually rather than selling off the whole lot in one go?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree knows Northern Ireland, knows how it works and knows its industries.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Instead of jumping at this loan book sale, should NAMA have examined alternatives? Would it have done better if it had considered a longer-term approach and looked at the bigger picture, rather than just taking this opportunity and getting rid of it all in one go?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could NAMA have done that?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I presume that was in the terms of reference for the documentation. We must remember the initial approach led to a bid document going out from NAMA. So if one were to bid against that, one would have to meet those terms of reference to acquire the loan book.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Now that the loan book has been sold off to Cerberus, does that have any effect? How will Cerberus handle that loan book from here on?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
In the next four or five years, how does Mr. Rowntree envisage the Cerberus involvement in Northern Ireland and elsewhere proceeding?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
There are mixed views as to how Cerberus has performed. Some people are quite pleased that they have been released, as they call it, from the shackles of NAMA. Some people say that. Some people also say that they have been treated very aggressively by a very aggressive vulture fund in service. Those are individual testaments from individual sources in corporate entities, but we are not seeing a huge amount of development on the ground.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would it be correct that there has not been much change since Cerberus took over?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Is it affecting the economy in Northern Ireland? Is the involvement of Cerberus slowing down the economy?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
The economy in Northern Ireland is something we are going to have to look at across a wider platform because of other measures. What we have is an economy that is growing, expanding and developing. However, like everywhere else because of other political reasons it will be more difficult as we go forward.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
One of the reasons NAMA gave for deciding to sell off the loan book was the deteriorating relationship with debtors and political considerations. Based on where he sits now, what does Mr. Rowntree believe it meant by that?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
NAMA claimed that the relationship was deteriorating with debtors in Northern Ireland and that was one of the reasons it decided to sell the loan book in one go. It was also stated that there were political reasons involved. From Mr. Rowntree's perspective, in view of what is happening inside Northern Ireland, why would it claim that its relationship with debtors was failing? The political considerations might have some sway.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think it is because the landbank in Northern Ireland was different from the landbank in Ireland. Those in the South had an overhang of housing and greater opportunity sites than we had. There was going to be a slower burn. It might have had the intention to go for a quick fix on this one. It takes a different strategic approach to work the Northern Ireland landbank out. That would have been taken as read. It is a mixed bag of tricks in many ways.
Also on the political side, yes, there was political angst regarding an immediate fix. However, we were not going to get an immediate fix around this. There never was going to be an such a fix. I pose the question: if there had not been a NAMA, where would the Northern Ireland landbank have been today?
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is a good question. Mr. Rowntree said he knew nothing about PIMCO, Cerberus or anything like that; he was just there as an adviser on Northern Ireland. Did he find it strange to learn afterwards that the same advisory and legal companies were used by PIMCO? There was a success fee of many millions and Mr. Cushnahan was involved in that so there was a three-way pay off. Was Mr. Rowntree surprised to learn that Tughans and the other legal advisers were still involved with Cerberus when it went on to buy the portfolio?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It is a commercial decision of the relevant bidder as to who it uses. I watched Mr. Frank Daly giving his evidence and quite rightly so. It is not a matter of concern to it as to who the bidder uses. It is a matter of whom the bidder contracts with itself. I am sure the bidder had its own reason for contracting with those corporate entities.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would success fees be normal in these sorts of deals?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Before we go, did Deputy Catherine Murphy indicate?
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could I go back to two questions?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Deputy Catherine Murphy has not contributed yet. I apologise, Deputy David Cullinane has indicated next. My mistake.
I ask Mr. Rowntree to clarify one thing he has mentioned quite a bit in the "Spotlight" programme, namely, that NIAC members had access to information of a commercially-sensitive nature and which offered commercial opportunities. That is the point he has been making all the time.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes. On several occasions, Frank Daly stated to this committee and to the Northern Ireland Assembly committee that external members of the NIAC did not gain any confidential information or any useful insider information from being a member of that advisory committee.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I am also on record in The Sunday Business Postand the Sunday Independentstating the exact same thing. I had sight of confidential information. Documentation that comes with heavy caveats and confidential provisions surrounding agreements with various lending agencies is confidential in my view. I will not dispute what Mr. Daly's view of confidentiality is. In my determination, that is a confidential document.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree is reiterating that. On the face of it, two different statements appear to flatly contradict each other and I am wondering if they do. We will put this question to Mr. Daly. Is it possible that, as Mr. Rowntree said, he got commercially sensitive information and it represented a commercial opportunity? We will put it to Mr. Daly that from his point of view maybe he is talking about debtor confidential information?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Does Mr. Rowntree get the subtle distinction?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is quite possible Mr. Frank Daly might say, "Yes, you had this general information, and yes, you saw the report, but you did not have any debtor sensitive information".
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would one be right in saying that?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Would Mr. Rowntree slow down and repeat that for me?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is possible but on the face of it, it does not look like it.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Can I dissent from that analysis?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am not analysing.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I strongly dissent from it.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will tease it out further. That is all I am saying. I just put it because it looks like a conflict. We will have to ask NAMA again on this. I call Deputy Cullinane.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree for his patience. I have a number of short questions first. How did Mr. Rowntree get on to the committee initially?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
By?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree have to apply?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree talked about the University of Ulster survey quite a lot. In terms of the presentations that were made, he mentioned Powerpoint presentations, etc.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Were hard copies of the documentation given to board members?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could Mr. Rowntree take those hard copies away with him?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
But Mr. Rowntree was given hard copies?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree also said that no similar study was carried out in the South.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree think that was a bad move on NAMA's part? Would it have been useful, if they had?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What I am trying to do here, and what we must try to do as a committee, is join up the dots and what the Comptroller and Auditor General also tried to do, through timelines and through processes and procedures, was join up the dots. I merely want to look at the established facts, talk Mr. Rowntree through those and see are we are on the same page. Obviously, we had the establishment of the NIAC.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree was one of those appointed to that-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----as well as Mr. Cushnahan. They were two of the external members appointed. Mr. Rowntree said he wanted to be a member because he wanted to bring his own experience. He was excited about the opportunities this presented in relation to shaping the North, housing and all of that, and I accept all of that.
The University of Ulster study, Mr. Rowntree says, was a land development model that offered potential. He was excited about some of the direction it was going in, etc. Is that fair?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The study offered a vision. Mr. Rowntree said it offered a way forward, and it was based on assets as well.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did Mr. Rowntree also then say that it would be gold dust, and certainly valuable, for somebody who would be looking to put together a portfolio of either assets or loans, and if he or she had that information he would have a smile?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It would have been gold dust.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It has real value.
As the University of Ulster survey was being examined by the NIAC, at some point we had the approach by PIMCO to NAMA. It was on the basis of a short and exclusive process that shifted from what was the thrust of the University of Ulster survey and where it wanted to go to NAMA's established policy in relation to how it was going to dispose of the assets to a loan sale that was about the debtors. That was PIMCO's model.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
But there was a switch. What I am saying is the switch initially came from the PIMCO approach. The PIMCO approach was that PIMCO wanted a loan portfolio sale.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Then we had a process which was opened up to a number of bidders and the Comptroller and Auditor General is critical of whether that was an open and competitive process. In fact, Mr. Daly, when he was here, stated that it was not as open and competitive as it could have been because of political pressures, but we will leave that to one side. We then had the Project Eagle portfolio and it was a loan-based portfolio.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am merely establishing the facts in terms of what happened. We then had the Project Eagle.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Exactly. Then we had the Project Eagle portfolio. What we then had was the emergence of success fees.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Those success fees involved one of those people who had access to the information that Mr. Rowntree said was of value.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Who would have had access to what Mr. Rowntree described as valuable information.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That information potentially would have contextualised a model of a portfolio of that size as well, would it not? That University of Ulster study information that would have been given talked about land assembly analysis and the data, not only on sites but on planning and residential need, information on banks, etc. It would have contextualised a model that then emerged from PIMCO and was eventually the Project Eagle portfolio. Would that be fair?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
What I said was that this requires a corporate governance review and independent investigation because what Deputy Cullinane is implying is that that can only have commercial value if the corporate governance provisions are breached. If there is no evidence that they were breached, then it has no commercial value.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We do not know whether that was breached but what we know is that-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I understand that. I will not speculate on whether it was breached or not, but what I am trying to establish is the facts and the timelines. What we know is that, whether there was a breach in that area or not, one of the external members of the committee was in line for a payment from PIMCO, which was one of the bidders in the process. That is what we know. That has been established.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Then it became, as the Minister for Finance, Deputy Noonan, said last week, an accepted corrupted process because of that and we know that PIMCO eventually withdrew from the process because of the presence of the success fees. Given that it moved from a solely commercial process to a potentially corrupted process, if Mr. Rowntree was a member of the NAMA board or if he was the chair of NAMA, would he have been more concerned about that? Given the established facts that we have agreed, and when we join the dots, would Mr. Rowntree have been concerned about the process at that point?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We know from the Comptroller and Auditor General's report that assurances that should have been sought were not sought and assurances that should have been given were never given. That is the entire point of the Comptroller and Auditor General's report. They never were sought and they were never given.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Therefore, the decision to proceed, and the risk, is a matter for the main NAMA board.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am asking Mr. Rowntree's opinion as a former board member. Given what it then knew and what we now know, does Mr. Rowntree consider the decision of the board to continue with the process regardless was the best way forward?
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I understand that.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
What I will say is that I cannot speak on behalf of the board. I would love to, but I cannot. It would not be appropriate for me to make a statement on behalf of the main NAMA board.
Nothing was ever advised to us as a committee that highlighted that there was a risk with the process. We were just told the process was live and proceeding.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I call Deputy Catherine Murphy.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I cannot figure out how a fire sale would have been in anybody's interest. Had all of the assets rather than the loan book been sold at the one time, if NAMA decided to sell them, they would have realised less.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That stands to reason.
Had the focus continued on assets as opposed to the sale of the loan book and that had been done in a gradual way, would there have been less risk and would it have produced dividends in terms of what Mr. Rowntree stated earlier about the outworking of the land banks?
Would that have produced a better potential return for Northern Ireland, and perhaps the taxpayer, in compliance with the NAMA Act?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
We do not have the financial equations to underpin the answer the Deputy needs. Any investment in a social dividend comes at a cost to the State and to those who are investing because one is dealing with those who are most vulnerable; therefore, the reward that emerges from these groupings is far less. Taking a mixed economy approach might have been in everyone's interest. I go to back to my earlier remarks. It may have been worth the consideration of a clause within the sale process to have some social dividend.
Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree said he would not have bought something if he had not done due diligence. I would not either, not that I would been that in position, given the amounts involved. The amount bid for the assets without having done due diligence was remarkably near the amount for which they were ultimately sold.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I was not a party to the formulation of the calculations that supported the tender or bid acceptance. I am sure those who were seeking to acquire the portfolio did their homework; therefore, on the other side, one has to look at whether the value was maximised. There are differences of opinion between the Comptroller and Auditor General and NAMA on the determination of value, but then one gets into the issue of corporate governance. That is why I said in my opening remarks that it behoved someone to conduct a corporate governance investigation into this process and produce an independent corporate governance report that would look at how the various processes were controlled and regulated, as well as at the validity of the assumptions and decisions made and how they were evidenced.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I refer to the timeline, as advised by Mr. Rowntree. He was informed on 7 October.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Daly briefed on Project Eagle; therefore, the name had been selected at that stage. The minutes state the chairman had broadly outlined what a NAMA sale process would entail with value and in an open market and key considerations for the agency. The committee discussed the approach to be taken and views were expressed. Mr. Rowntree raised a number of issues such as the sale of a portfolio of such a scale leading to strategic land locking and the sale requiring value to be achieved by NAMA, with transparency as a protection in this regard. The minutes further state: "The approach from PIMCO implies that a value can be obtained from the portfolio although the NI debtor portfolio also includes British assets" and a discount would be sought and that, therefore, the question of value was key for NAMA - sell versus hold. The discussion included external member feedback on the proposed approach. I ask Mr. Rowntree to reach into his powers of recollection as I would like to get a sense of the discussion which took place. Earlier we agreed that there was a set compass which was asset focused as against debtor working out. Work was done by the Univeristy of Ulster and then, bang, out of nowhere this came. I presume the matters are recorded, as would be expected, in a neutral fashion on the page. Was Mr. Rowntree concerned when this happened? The discount has been a lively topic in respect of the portfolio. That emerged in the discussion. Will Mr. Rowntree talk us through that meeting and exchange?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It was intense, as the Deputy will appreciate. It is quite confusing because we were being informed of an approach to the main board but there was no real substance as to why the approach was being made. If the Deputy looks at the bullet points to which she referred, the assets are not mentioned in any of them. It is the value of the loans, not the value of the assets that is referred to. We were in a situation where in all of our previous discussions we had looked at where we would take Northern Ireland and where we would work for its betterment and go against the fire sale provision. One could argue that we had a fire sale of the loans here as opposed to a fire sale of the assets.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The chairman advised the committee that an unsolicited approach had been made to NAMA by PIMCO to buy the debtor portfolio, not the assets.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The preliminary discussions had taken place and he advised Mr. Rowntree that the board would consider the matter at its meeting on the 10th with a view to possible further engagement and that the respective Finance Ministers, Deputy Michael Noonan and Mr. Hamilton, had discussed the matter at a recent meeting. The minutes reflect the fact that the Minister for Finance's view was that it was a commercial matter for NAMA. They state: "The chairman broadly outlined what a NAMA sales process would entail". Did he tell Mr. Rowntree that it would be what he told us - a "bespoke" process?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
When he outlined what a NAMA sale process would entail-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did he say at that stage that PIMCO had been looking for exclusivity?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Therefore, he did not go into whether it would be a one, two or three-stage process?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will come to that point within the boundaries of the Cathaoirleach's nervous system. The minutes state: "The approach from PIMCO implies that value can be obtained from the portfolio". An assumption was made. That is an interesting bullet point because I do not understand what they were getting at with the committee. Was there a bit of a sell to say, "Listen, lads, this makes sense"?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
The issue was that they were saying PIMCO could realise the value of the portfolio. The question has to be: could NAMA have realised it? That was not ours to ask anymore because the decision had been made by the board that they were handling the process.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I refer to this discussion, giving the talking shop its full standing. I should not be sarcastic with Mr. Rowntree and do not mean to be offensive. They are taking the trouble to inform the committee that it is happening. To me that reads that there was a bit of a sell to say------
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I entirely agree.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank Mr. Rowntree. Bullet point No. 4 is the most intriguing for our purposes. It states a discount would be sought - naturally, we all live in the real world - therefore, the question of value is key for NAMA - sell versus hold. Mr. Rowntree does not recall who made the point about the discount.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Therefore, the discount would have been a key issue.
What was Mr. Rowntree's understanding of the discount level applied generally? Would he have been privy to that?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It relates to whether they were sold at par - being the value that NAMA paid for them - or whether they were sold at a value to attract and hold PIMCO in the process.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I refer to what the records reflect at that early stage. Even though preliminary discussions had been had with PIMCO - Mr. Rowntree can only speak for himself; Mr. Cushnahan obviously is a different person with a different history in these matters - the issue of discount is there. I assume that Mr. Rowntree would have assumed that on a matter like discounting the debtor portfolio, NAMA would have sought advice, evidence and expertise.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So there would be a rationale for the application of whatever discount rate was arrived at?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is public money.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Could the Deputy help me as I might have missed it at the beginning? What document is Deputy McDonald reading from?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am reading from the minutes of a meeting of the Northern Ireland advisory committee on 7 October.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It is just we did not have it on screen.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Pardon me, I should have said it. Does Mr. Rowntree recall anything else - any nuggets of wisdom - from that exchange I have missed?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I think both advisers to the committee were also discussing the issue of the guarantees that applied- the personal guarantees, PGs. In particular, I asked whether they would travel or be part of the discount arrangements that would be offered regarding the purchase of the loans - whether they would be set aside.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What was Mr. Rowntree's view regarding what should have happened?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I thought the loans were taken, that NAMA had the securitisation and that this securitisation would transfer across Cerberus, or to PIMCO at that stage. For NAMA to even consider setting aside the PGs, it would have had to have a rationale for doing so. If it could set them aside at a sale process, why could it not set them aside in terms of a business case settlement? In my view, one would be setting some precedent in doing this. The conversation was at a very high level, no great detail was offered and it was more or less advising us that the board had met and had come to a certain sense of reality around this situation.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The discussion included external member feedback, meaning Mr. Rowntree, on the proposed approach to support the board's decision on the matter at its meeting on 10 October 2013.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So the board was seeking Mr. Rowntree's nod or-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was it asking for Mr. Rowntree's imprimatur, acquiescence or agreement regarding this approach?
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I accept that but-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So Mr. Rowntree thought it was worth exploring.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I assume Mr. Rowntree makes that remark of consideration based on a very rigorous examination of the decision to sell the portfolio and at what rate and value-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay. It then gets very interesting. That happened on 7 October. The board met on 10 October, approved it and said it was going to examine the proposal. By early December, the indicative offer from PIMCO was on the table and by late December moving into early January, there was approval to dispose of the thing so it happened very quickly. Maybe that is the way these things happen. I quoted from the minutes of the board meeting on 7 October. Mr. Rowntree met the board again on 9 December.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
At that stage, the indicative offer was on the table. At that meeting in December, an update regarding the University of Ulster at Jordanstown project was provided.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What I do not see is an update regarding-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----PIMCO and Project Eagle.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It appeared that the eagle had flown.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Let us tease our way through this because the documentation supports Mr. Rowntree's point. That is the meeting in December. December through to January saw the approval to dispose of the portfolio and the appointment of the sales advisers. It broke in the media in February that something was afoot. The data room was opened in February and there was material with the Comptroller and Auditor General where concerns were raised or observations made. PIMCO withdrew in March while closing date for bids was April. On 3 April, the board approved the sale. During all of that time, there was no meeting of the Northern Ireland advisory committee.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The committee met in October and there was no update at the December meeting. The next meeting was on 28 April in the Ewart Suite in the Hilton Hotel, which I know well, in Belfast.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was a done deal at that stage.
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
So Mr. Rowntree's point is that far from this being a Northern matter-----
Mary Lou McDonald (Dublin Central, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----in fact, the Northern committee was completely written out of the equation in respect of the sales process. Would that be a fair reflection of the facts?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
As I said in my opening remarks, I thank the committee for the invitation and opportunity to set the facts before it. The facts are that the Northern Ireland advisory committee was written out of the equation and the matter was controlled and administered by the main NAMA board.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will take Deputy Connolly and then Deputy Aylward. We are nearly there
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I return to the minutes of the meeting on 7 October. In respect of the time span, the Ulster issue was raised for the first time on 16 December 2011. I have checked the minutes and Mr. Rowntree is correct. There were a number of presentations relating to that in 2012. It was an active discussion up until Project Eagle-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----at that presentation Deputy McDonald went through with Mr. Rowntree, which I will not go through again. Up to that point, the Ulster project was very active and the committee was getting updates.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
With regard to the point I made to Deputy Kelly, this was a very high-level strategic approach. It is an evidence-based approach. When you are dealing with a portfolio the size of the Northern Ireland portfolio, never mind the larger Irish portfolio, you want as much evidence to support decision making as possible. There were very intense discussions around what that might look like and whether there were any other contributions or interventions we wanted to make. As I said, the position then changed.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is right and that is clear when you put the minutes together-----
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree thought there was one approach but really there was a separate approach that Mr. Rowntree only became aware of when this was presented to him on 7 October.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What I mean by two approaches is there was something going on in the background in respect of Project Eagle. We know that now.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree did not know that but we know that. We know it goes right back because I have a note here from 14 June 2013. It is just a short note about the meeting the day before between Sammy Wilson, the then Minister for Finance in Northern Ireland, and the Minister for Finance, Deputy Noonan. It noted that Mr. Wilson raised concerns about NAMA's operation in Northern Ireland and its commitment. He also queried whether NAMA would consider a full divestment of its Northern Ireland portfolio as this was something it had been approached about. The Minister for Finance, Deputy Noonan, said that it was a matter for NAMA, quite rightly, but that he would raise it later with the advisory committee.
I presume that refers to the other advisory committee, not the Northern Ireland advisory committee.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That was in June 2013. Was Mr. Rowntree aware of this?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will return to the minutes of the October meeting which are crucial and have been discussed in forensic detail. I note, on page 106, that they refer to matters the committee had discussed in respect of Project Eagle. They state: "The discussion included External Member feedback on the proposed approach to support the Board's consideration of the matter at its meeting on 10th October 2013".
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Nothing was recorded, however, about what had been said.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes. While the minutes state the discussion was to support the board's consideration, they do not tell us what was said. They tell us lots of other things. The document states the discussion included external member feedback on the proposed approach to support the board's consideration, but it does not tell us what that feedback was.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Thie meeting of 7 October was Mr. Cushnahan's last.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
He did not appear again after that.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
As has been pointed out, the next meeting was held in December and the meeting after that was held in April. At that stage, the sale of Project Eagle had been completed.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I have a number of quick questions. It has been said repeatedly by different witnesses from NAMA - this was touched on by Deputy Bobby Aylward - that the Northern debtors were cranky, that they were not working or playing ball and that the market was extremely bad. I have looked at all of the minutes and the Comptroller and Auditor General included a reference to this. The market and rents were picking up.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
This is noted throughout the minutes. Is that correct?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
There was investor interest.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
The requirement for grade A commercial property was on the rise extensively. Also - this was discussed in general at meetings - we had the requirement to look at the regeneration aspects of commercial and industrial property and at how we could look at regenerating areas where we had vacant sites.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Various briefing documents to the Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael Noonan, confirm that more than two thirds of the debtors were working hand in hand with NAMA. Is that correct?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
On what Mr. Rowntree has said about not knowing about Project Eagle and so on, how does he reconcile this with NAMA's statement that no confidential information was put before him? He has clearly stated today, in terms of the University of Ulster report, that there was confidential information.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
That is a matter for determination. The committee and others reviewing this matter will look at the definition of "confidential". What I would say is that if one conducts a corporate governance investigation and review of Project Eagle and one looks at the reference material contained within the NAMA Northern Ireland advisory committee, that review will give a clear determination on what was or was not confidential. I may have got it wrong or Mr. Daly may have got it wrong or perhaps we are both right.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
What happened to the University of Ulster report?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It just went off the agenda.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was obviously no longer relevant in relation to NAMA because the portfolio had been sold.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The portfolio represented 3% of the overall property with which NAMA was dealing.
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I have one or two final questions. When the Minister for Finance was before the committee, I put it to him that he had stated in September 2013 that Project Eagle was the only game in town. He denied making this statement and described it as not accurate. It is, however, included in one of the notes taken after a Northern Ireland meeting. He said it in September 2013. Was Mr. Rowntree aware of this?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The advisers - Brown Rudnick in London and Tughans - had to sign non-disclosure agreements when they went into the data room. Was Mr. Rowntree aware of this?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
They had signed a non-disclosure agreement, which means that they could not disclose any information, yet the same two firms went forward to Cerberus. Can Mr. Rowntree comment on this?
Catherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree cannot comment on it.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I have an observation to make. In hindsight, Mr. Rowntree must be disappointed. Having been a member of an advisory board in Northern Ireland which had been in place for many reasons and having for many years advised on asset control and sales, all of a sudden the committee was dismissed, NAMA took a different route and the committee was forgotten about. That must have been disappointing for Mr. Rowntree who had been advising NAMA and had much goodwill towards the Northern Ireland economy and businesses there. NAMA went for the sale of the loan book instead of an asset driven process. Having listened to Mr. Rowntree's evidence, it seems the Northern Ireland advisory committee was basically dismissed. It talked for a couple of years and then that was it.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
We got our P45s and were told we were no longer required. It is frustrating more than disappointing because there is potential to provide a dividend in society. Perhaps this is outside the terms of the committee, but when I look at the housing issue in Ireland and the housing issue in Northern Ireland, I ask what do we have. Do we have a testament to success or do we have something which was a financial solution that fitted in a moment in time, that is, it fitted an approach from another source? I think there is a balance to be achieved between maximising value and also getting some dividend in society. The two were not as well balanced as they should have been. However, that is said in hindsight and everyone is great in hindsight. I certainly believe the conditions which NAMA created and the opportunity it created were not exploited to the full.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We did not know much about the University of Ulster report before today. It appears to be significant, yet no one has seen it, other than members of the advisory committee who saw it privately. Should NAMA have looked at it more? I presume considerable finance and research went into the report which was never used. If the committee had access to it, it would have a better insight into the reasons NAMA sold the loan book rather than the assets. I would like to see the report, find out what is in it and compare its contents with what happened later. Mr. Rowntree has seen it. Would it have made a difference if it had been used properly?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
I cannot really say because I was not part of the discussion on the sale of Project Eagle. What I can say is that, as Deputy Catherine Connolly said, there were quite animated discussions in the build-up to the draft report from the University of Ulster. There was a level of intensity around these discussions which were focused on opportunity and strategic visioning, but that was set aside. Someone has an evidence base somewhere, I presume, that says we no long require this and this is the best we can achieve, that is, selling the loan book.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We do not see that anywhere.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
May we seek that information?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We will raise the matter directly with NAMA. Considerable emphasis has been placed on the University of Ulster report today and we will seek a copy of it. I am conscious that Ulster Bank, Santander Bank and other entities may have contributed to the report and that, therefore, it may not be in NAMA's gift to provide a copy for the committee. However, we can ask for a copy.
On achieving value for money, the NAMA loan book was sold for approximately £1.25 billion, with approximately half of the assets relating to the loan book based in Northern Ireland. This means that approximately €600 million of the sale proceeds were related to assets in Northern Ireland. Is that correct?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am not sure where we saw it, but it has been indicated in several reports that 50% of the assets were in Northern Ireland, 38% were in-----
That might have been asset location as opposed to valuation and-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Perhaps the Comptroller and Auditor General could clarify that.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
By value?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Hold on. The collateral -----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Is the Comptroller and Auditor General saying that approximately-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The Comptroller and Auditor General is saying that because the market in Northern Ireland was weaker than in parts of northern England -----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
-----it would have been less than 50%.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
According to the report, somewhere between €400 million or €500 million of NAMA collateral assets were based in Northern Ireland. Does the Comptroller or Auditor General have any idea-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
It was massive. It was about 70% impairment-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Fine. Like down here, Ulster Bank had a big portfolio of debt, as did Santander and a number of other banks. In terms of the study being carried out by the University of Ulster, how much of that, if it was identifiable, related to NAMA?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is interesting. In terms of the report that has been presented here, only 25% related to NAMA's interests in Northern Ireland. The rest related to the other banks.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Correct but NAMA was potentially one quarter of the overall market in Northern Ireland, which is quite significant in anyone's eyes.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Okay. I was worried earlier because I thought this was a NAMA report and that it all related to its assets. We now find that three quarters of that report relates to other entities. It is for Northern Ireland, not just NAMA and that is why the others were involved.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was that in the report?
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
It is in that report, yes. That report is made up of several component parts. It contains individual reports on each bank's individual land holdings. Those are confidential to each bank. Then there is a consolidation report in which individual portfolios are not identifiable. There is also the NAMA section, which NAMA would have itself.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
That is exactly the point I was getting to, namely, whether it was possible to identify the various banks in that report. Mr. Rowntree is saying that NAMA had NAMA-specific information.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did the external members to the board have that?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The members had NAMA-specific information.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Was there a value put on that in terms of the €1.3 billion?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We have not heard anything about the value of the NAMA portfolio. I think that is the first reference we have heard to anything recent.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
No, I think the most significant thing about values is that they depend on whether one lets the land sit or re-profiles the planning and takes a different approach in terms of development potential. The present values are not really where one wants to sit. One wants to focus ones gaze on how to re-profile planning in terms of future value.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree is saying that there was a chapter specific to NAMA dealing with different methods of valuation, depending on what happened to the land. That is highly commercially-sensitive information.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We did not know there was such a specific report in existence. We really appreciate Mr. Rowntree's help on this. We will have to chase NAMA for part of the information. Was there any information in that NAMA chapter which linked any of their major debtors to the particular lands?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Fine, but there was tremendous information about the valuation of the NAMA-controlled lands in this chapter. I know Mr. Rowntree did not and the board never discussed it but if someone had debtor-specific information and had that report, he or she could match the two in the blink of an eye. Does Mr. Rowntree understand-----
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Can I ask if the Comptroller and Auditor General was aware of the report.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I must qualify this by saying that it could only be done if someone breached corporate governance rules. If there was no breach of corporate governance, such a link would not be made. If there was a breach, however, a child of two could put the pieces together.
Bobby Aylward (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Sure, we will never know.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
We might not. I just want to know if I am following the logic through.
Mr. Brian Rowntree:
Absolutely. The report itself was designed and intended to inform an internal discussion. If corporate governance was breached, one would assume that the same discussion that took place internally could take place externally. That would apply to any public body with confidential information.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Let us be clear, the approach by Pimco on day one was initiated by two major NAMA debtors. We have all read about that. They went to different people and put a plan together. I read somewhere that the five or six debtor groupings represented 85% of the total loan book at the end of the day. Therefore, it would not take much to link the five or six people to this chapter of the report that was commissioned for NAMA on the valuations of its loans -----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I am not-----
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree cannot answer those questions. I am just thinking out loud as to future questions as a result of Mr. Rowntree's help today.
David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
May I ask again if the Comptroller and Auditor General knew of the report?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Did the Comptroller and Auditor General get that report?
Mr. Seamus McCarthy:
We were aware of the work, the analysis that had been done, from the minutes of the NIAC. We did not examine it. Just to put it in context, there was a revision of the strategy for Northern Ireland assets which was considered by the NIAC in April of 2013 and approved by the board of NAMA in May of 2013. The timing fits. The University of Ulster information was presented, according to the minutes, in February or March of 2013. That would appear to be the basis on which the revision of the strategy for the assets in Northern Ireland was adopted in May 2013.
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree, what revision of strategy happened in terms of the NAMA assets?
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Yes. It reads "updated in May 2013".
Seán Fleming (Laois, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Mr. Rowntree has been most helpful. He has provided some information of which this committee was not fully aware. There is information in the system and we will ask NAMA for a copy of the report. It would have been nice had NAMA told us about it when its representatives were here for several hours recently. We will ask NAMA for that now. If there are no other questions, I propose that we conclude.
I thank Mr. Rowntree sincerely for his time. He has been with us for three hours this afternoon. I hope we were not too severe on him. We appreciate his input. I also thank Mr. McCarthy and his colleagues for attending.