Anthony Lawlor (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I shall rephrase my question on head 6(3)(2), which reads: "The media rights committee shall consist of no more than 5 members appointed by HRI and may include members who are not members of HRI." Can the Department, before the legislation is brought before the Dáil, consider replacing the word "may" with the word "should"? There is a fear that conflict between the HRI and racecourses may arise some time in the future, particularly for racecourses not owned by the HRI. There should also be outside members rather than members of HRI, if possible.

It is strange that while the Racing Regulatory Body must engage in consultation, HRI can issue directives on the rules of racing and integrity. Can we change that situation? Is it possible for the Department to ensure the HRI must consult as well as issue directives? If so, instead of one telling the other what to do, both would have to consult.

Part of the intention of this Bill, following the Indecon report, is to achieve streamlining and savings. I asked the HRI about such matters, but it could not indicate how many people would be let go or where savings would be made. Can the Department indicate where savings will take place and how long the process will last?

We still have not received 2013 annual report from HRI. Is the Department happy with that situation?