Andrew Doyle (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The purpose of the Bill is to be able to capture all forms of betting that are relevant to an event in this country. The enabling legislation is required and then the rates can be established after that. If one can capture it all, that would bring up the amount of revenue anyway and then if one increases the percentage, one can double it or treble it. That is vitally important. From the point of view of the committee, it is important for the point to be continually made. Some might say the legislation is cosmetic but at least if one structures the HRI properly – board membership and representation will be vital - then one has an entity that can address the industry itself in a proactive way, but one needs money. There are two sides to the equation, no matter what way we look at it. That point has come through loud and clear. Maintaining the integrity is hugely important. We all accept what was said about prize money. The mere fact that smaller races attract larger bets is always a concern.

Apart from briefings from officials, the witnesses before us are the first ones to speak to us about the Bill. The officials said that under head 11 the term used is consultation which means it does not require agreement. The point was raised when we had a briefing with the committee. Deputy Pringle might have the correct interpretation but the matter requires clarification. An impression is given and the situation must be clarified on whether the measure extends to the regulatory body. The regulatory body would consult or inform.