Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform: Select Sub-Committee on Finance
Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Bill 2011: Committee Stage
7:40 pm
Michael Noonan (Limerick City, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I move amendment No. 47:
This amendment provides for a system of customer redress where financial service providers engage in misconduct that is widespread or recurring and causes customers loss or damage. The amendments also provides that a failure by a financial service provider to comply with regulatory requirements may be actionable by a customer who suffers loss or damage.
In page 24, before section 37, to insert the following new section:“PART 537.—(1) Where the Bank is satisfied—
CUSTOMER PROTECTION(2) In subsection (1) “relevant default” means—(a) that there have been widespread or regular relevant defaults by a regulated financial service provider, andthe Bank may give the regulated financial service provider a direction requiring the making of appropriate redress to the customers.
(b) that, in consequence of the relevant defaults, customers of the regulated financial service provider have suffered, are suffering or will suffer loss or damage,(a) charging a customer an amount which the regulated financial service provider is not entitled to charge,(3) In subsection (1) “appropriate redress” means such monetary or other redress as is specified in the direction and (in the case of redress for pecuniary loss) as does not exceed the amount of the loss suffered or anticipated to be suffered, together (where appropriate) with interest at such rate as is so specified.
(b) providing a customer with a financial service which the customer has not agreed to receive,
(c) providing a customer with a financial service which was not suitable for the customer at the time when it was provided,
(d) providing a customer with inaccurate information which influences the customer in making a decision about any financial service,
(e) a failure of any system or controls of the regulated financial service provider, or
(f) a prescribed contravention.
(4) A direction given under subsection (1) may require the costs of the Bank in giving the direction to be met by the regulated financial service provider to whom the direction is given.
(5) The fact that a regulated financial service provider has made redress in compliance with a direction given under subsection (1) shall not, of itself, constitute for any purpose an admission of liability by the regulated financial service provider.
(6) A decision by the Bank to give a direction under subsection (1) is an appealable decision for the purposes of Part VIIA of the Act of 1942.
(7) The provisions of a direction given under subsection (1) have effect from the date specified in the direction in relation to them.
(8) A direction given under subsection (1) shall set out—(a) all terms of the direction, including any specification of a date by which, or a period within which, any provision made by it is to be complied with, and(9) The Bank may publish a direction given under subsection (1) in any such manner as the Bank considers appropriate.
(b) any incidental, consequential or supplemental provisions for implementing the direction and securing that it is fully and effectively carried out.
(10) Where the Bank is considering a complaint, or investigating any other matter, for the purpose of deciding whether to give a direction under subsection (1) it may publish notice that it is doing so in any such manner as the Bank considers appropriate.
(11) The duty imposed on the Bank by section 57BX(11) of the Act of 1942 to refer a complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman does not apply in relation to a complaint if the Bank has dealt with the complaint by giving a direction under subsection (1) or during any period when the Bank is considering the complaint for the purpose of deciding whether to give such a direction.
(12) The duty imposed on the Financial Services Ombudsman to investigate a complaint does not apply if the Bank has dealt with the complaint by giving a direction under subsection (1) or during any period when the Bank is considering the complaint for the purpose of deciding whether to give such a direction.”.