Mr. John Conlon:

We have had sessions at this committee before on that. There are two broad reasons for it. There is the modular element itself, which was fairly cost effective. What drove the cost substantially in a lot of cases was poor sites, getting access to services - power and wastewater - and very small sites. In retrospect, looking back on this, which is one of the learnings from the projects, if we are going to deliver further modular homes, we need to do them on better sites and better serviced sites.