Written answers

Wednesday, 20 March 2024

Department of Education and Skills

School Funding

Photo of Rose Conway-WalshRose Conway-Walsh (Mayo, Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

498. To ask the Minister for Education and Skills if an emergency works application can be made retrospectively in the case of necessary works to ensure the functioning of the fire alarm system; if she is aware of an application of a school (details supplied) in Mayo that was refused; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [12666/24]

Photo of Norma FoleyNorma Foley (Kerry, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The main purpose of the Emergency Works Scheme is to provide for unforeseen emergencies that impact on school buildings. An emergency is a situation which poses an immediate risk to health, life, property or the environment, which is sudden, unforeseen and requires immediate action and, in the case of a school, if not corrected would prevent the school or part thereof from opening. The scheme does so by ensuring the availability of funding for urgent works to those schools that are in need of resources as a result of an emergency situation.

The school to which the deputy refers applied for retrospective funding for a fire alarm control panel. My Department does not provide retrospective funding for any projects in line with Circular PBU 5/04, which outlines the position in relation to retrospective funding, and is attached for your information.

Circular PBU 5/04

To: Primary and Post Primary School Authorities

Schools seeking funding retrospectively for capital works

The Planning and Building Unit has received a number of applications from school authorities seeking retrospective funding in respect of capital works carried out without the prior approval of the Department of Education and Science.

School authorities should be aware that they are responsible for funding any works that they, or a member of their staff, authorise. School authorities should therefore ensure that they are certain of their ability to fund any works before such works are authorised.

It is inappropriate for school authorities to commit to projects and to apply retrospectively for funding. It is therefore Department policy not to provide funding for:

a) projects undertaken by schools without prior approval from the Department;

b) extras on authorised projects where schools have extended the scope of works without prior approval;

c) variations on authorised projects with the exception of those variations detailed below; or

d) variations and extras on any project carried out without the Department’s approval.

Costs incurred in advancing a project beyond the authorised stage are a matter for the school management authority.

Additional works extending the scope of the project

The Department has noted that some schools request additional works to be carried out while contractors are on site even though these works do not form part of the agreed tender. Examples include additional lighting or electrical installations; extended renovation briefs up to, and including, higher quality finishes than those specified in the tender documentation.

It is important for the school management authority to realise that the Department will not reimburse schools in respect of such unapproved works.

Variations

Variations are unexpected changes to the nature or scope of the project due to unforeseen circumstances. A variation is initiated by the design team and is essential for the successful completion of the project. An example of a variation would be where isolated soft spots are encountered in the foundation trench excavations and the depth of foundations needs to be adjusted.

2

Procedures for funding such variations are clearly set out in the Design Team Procedures.

I. As pre-planning is the basis for the Design Team Procedures, only variations attributed to wholly unforeseen circumstances will be permitted. The Design Team does not have the discretion to expend any or all of the Contingency sum for non-essential works or works which could have been foreseen.

II. Individual extras not exceeding €1,524 (Primary Schools) and €2,500 (Post Primary Schools) in value (excluding VAT) may be authorised by the Architect without reference to the Building Unit, provided the works were essential and wholly unforeseen and provided the Contingency Sum is not exceeded.

III. Individual extras exceeding €1,524 (primary) or €2,500 (post Primary) in value are only allowable if they could not have been foreseen in the course of planning, arise from exceptional circumstances and are agreed in advance by the Department.

Where a Bill of Reductions has been agreed at tender stage to bring the project within acceptable costs, the reductions agreed must not be re-introduced as variations.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.