Written answers

Thursday, 25 November 2010

Department of Defence

Departmental Expenditure

5:00 pm

Photo of Bernard DurkanBernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context

Question 239: To ask the Minister for Defence the extent of any over or under-expenditure, capital or current, by Vote, heading or subheading to date in 2010 in tabular form; the reason for any surplus or shortfall; if expenditure to date in each case is in line with budgetary projections; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44654/10]

Photo of Tony KilleenTony Killeen (Clare, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The information requested is set out in the following tables:

DEFENCE (VOTE 36)

ExpenditureGross€m.Net€m.
Non-CapitalProfile to end- October 2010601563
Actual to end-October 2010566525
Variation3538
CapitalProfile to end- October 2010115
Actual to end-October 201084
Variation31

Expenditure on the Defence Vote to date in 2010 is somewhat lower than profiled across pay and non-pay subheads. However, there are significant spending commitments for the remainder of the year. At this stage it is projected that the year-end position will show gross savings of approx €21m, excesses of approx €12.5m and surplus appropriations-in-aid of approx €1m, resulting in overall net savings of €9.5m.

ARMY PENSIONS (VOTE 37)

ExpenditureGross €m.Net €m.
Profile to end- October 2010173168
Actual to end-October 2010179174
Variation-6-6

Expenditure to date on the Army Pensions Vote is higher than profiled and a Supplementary Estimate in the sum of €9.5m is required for 2010. This arises mainly from the higher than anticipated number of personnel leaving the Permanent Defence Force and qualifying for gratuity and pension.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.