Written answers
Thursday, 25 November 2010
Department of Defence
Departmental Expenditure
5:00 pm
Bernard Durkan (Kildare North, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Question 239: To ask the Minister for Defence the extent of any over or under-expenditure, capital or current, by Vote, heading or subheading to date in 2010 in tabular form; the reason for any surplus or shortfall; if expenditure to date in each case is in line with budgetary projections; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [44654/10]
Tony Killeen (Clare, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context
The information requested is set out in the following tables:
DEFENCE (VOTE 36)
Expenditure | Gross€m. | Net€m. | |
Non-Capital | Profile to end- October 2010 | 601 | 563 |
Actual to end-October 2010 | 566 | 525 | |
Variation | 35 | 38 | |
Capital | Profile to end- October 2010 | 11 | 5 |
Actual to end-October 2010 | 8 | 4 | |
Variation | 3 | 1 |
Expenditure on the Defence Vote to date in 2010 is somewhat lower than profiled across pay and non-pay subheads. However, there are significant spending commitments for the remainder of the year. At this stage it is projected that the year-end position will show gross savings of approx €21m, excesses of approx €12.5m and surplus appropriations-in-aid of approx €1m, resulting in overall net savings of €9.5m.
ARMY PENSIONS (VOTE 37)
Expenditure | Gross €m. | Net €m. |
Profile to end- October 2010 | 173 | 168 |
Actual to end-October 2010 | 179 | 174 |
Variation | -6 | -6 |
Expenditure to date on the Army Pensions Vote is higher than profiled and a Supplementary Estimate in the sum of €9.5m is required for 2010. This arises mainly from the higher than anticipated number of personnel leaving the Permanent Defence Force and qualifying for gratuity and pension.
No comments