Eileen Flynn (Independent)

It is great to hear the Minister of State is not opposing the amendments in this section. It is important I am very clear. Amendments Nos. 2, 4, 22, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 37 and 43 were addressed at the previous debate with the then Minister, Deputy McEntee, and, since then, we have got support. We have been through these amendments with a fine-tooth comb. We know there will be no cost to the State and it is the right thing for the State to do. Language is of extreme importance. The only difference this is going to make is that judges will not have to use the term “child pornography” in courtrooms anymore. They can say how it is, and that is child sexual abuse with materials. It is so important we are clear. I am aware the Minister of State is not opposing these amendments, but I also want to put on the record that we have done what was asked of us by the Department of justice. As Senator Boyhan said, I am as broad as I am long coming in here and getting it to this stage, and not having 100% commitment from the Government is a bit disheartening. However, again, we did our work and I am delighted the Minister of State is not opposing these amendments. I do want to be very clear that it will not cost the State anything and, if anything, the Government will leave a good, positive legacy behind. It is simple and effective.