Seanad debates

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

Investment Limited Partnerships (Amendment) Bill 2020: Committee Stage

 

10:30 am

Photo of Alice-Mary HigginsAlice-Mary Higgins (Independent) | Oireachtas source

I move amendment No. 1:

In page 6, between lines 3 and 4, to insert the following:

“Report

4. Within 12 months of the passing of this Act, the Minister shall lay before both Houses of the Oireachtas a report in respect of the impact and use of the provisions in this Act, including a consideration of compatibility with the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) guidelines, and their impact, if any, on the Revenue Commissioners.”.

In addition to outlining the intent behind the amendment, there are some points relating to the wider section that I wish to address. This amendment relates to the introduction of a new section that would require the Minister to lay before both Houses a report looking at the impact and use of the provisions of this Act in terms of compatibility with the OECD base erosion and profit shifting guidelines. There would be real concerns if we found ourselves in a situation where the investment industry felt that it was ahead of the Oireachtas in the context of this Bill. With this amendment, I suggest that a report be provided by the Minister within 12 months of the passing of the legislation. Such a report would be crucial when it comes to compliance with and best practice in the context of the OECD guidelines.That is something we should look at before this Bill passes and why I concur with requests that we have a return to prelegislative scrutiny. The Bill is not so advanced that it should not be possible.

We know, for example, we are dealing with a large amount of money. The total value of investment funds domiciled and administered in Ireland is €4.9 trillion. The amount of money lost internationally on an annual basis due to base erosion and profit shifting, BEPS, is €240 billion. Much of it is lost to some of the poorest countries in the world.

I am concerned, specifically, around some of the measures in this Bill that lessen liabilities. I note my amendments in respect of the Revenue Commissioners at a later stage. I am concerned about the lessening of potential liabilities in respect of our own tax base. However, I am also concerned about the erosion of liabilities in other areas of this Bill, including the revenue of other countries. I am somewhat concerned, specifically, about some of the provisions in the Bill on lessening liability and which seem to even lessen criminal liability. Again, there are positive aspects in this Bill in terms of tackling money laundering but there are also places where we are, in fact, removing offences or removing potential liability under offences. Again, in terms of due scrutiny and due process that is not ideal. It is something we need to look at.

I will be pressing this amendment. I will, however, also bring forward amendments to the effect that certain sections of this Bill should not commence until a review of compatibility with base erosion and profit shifting guidelines from the OECD is done. Indeed, I will also look to suggest the timeframe. Twelve months is the timeframe I gave. I wrote this amendment prior to the revelations about the progress of this Bill and the question marks that have arisen regarding appropriate best parliamentary progress being seen to be done. It is not just about being done but about that question being seen to be done.

It is important we have scrutiny of this Bill. I am hopeful the Minister of State might accept this amendment. I reserve the right to put forward stronger wording in terms of a report at a later stage. Given the trillions of euro in investment funds passing through Ireland, we have a huge responsibility to not only abide by the basic letter of the law but be seen to give leadership in terms of the highest possible standards. I will be pressing this amendment. I hope the Minister of State might be able to indicate that he will accept this amendment. It would give some signal of positive commitment to scrutiny and I will follow by hoping he will indicate that sections of this Bill might not commence until after the information has been provided.

I have a final request. If the Minister of State has information on the OECD and BEPS guidelines in this Bill he would like to make available to all in this House in advance of this Bill resuming, that would be useful.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.