Ivana Bacik (Independent) | Oireachtas source

I take Senator Kelleher's view on this. I am a co-sponsor of the amendment with my Labour Party colleague. Many of us felt the word "serious" would elevate the level of risk and operate as a barrier to women. I found the briefing very persuasive yesterday regarding why the word is included. It is important for any of us on the pro-choice side who have concerns to examine the full text of the test set out in section 9 and examine in particular the test set out in paragraph 9(1)(c).

Having listened to Dr. Boylan and Dr. Murphy, I am satisfied it is a test that is operable for doctors and does not pose any additional barriers to women's access other than what was set out in the campaign on the deletion or repeal of the eighth amendment. I would prefer a different basis or framework on which women might have access to abortion, and one that might set the bar lower, but that is my personal view. I am, however, very cognisant that this was the framework on which we campaigned for repeal and on which there was a general consensus in the repeal movement that we should campaign. Doctors have told us it is an operable framework that does not pose a barrier that is too inaccessible in the provision of safe and legal abortion. This is my overriding concern, along with my previously expressed concern that I want to see the legislation brought into effect so we can ensure women have access to the abortion services we so badly need from 1 January.