Seanad debates

Monday, 9 July 2018

Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017: Committee Stage (Resumed)

 

2:00 pm

Photo of David NorrisDavid Norris (Independent) | Oireachtas source

I would like to move on to the kernel of the situation and point out that a member of Sinn Féin, Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh, who I know is not here to defend himself, thought this Bill was a great idea because it would prevent judges with what he described as an anti-republican bias from being appointed to the court.If that is not political interference, I do not know what is. They can interfere to make sure that somebody who does not suit their particular political complexion does not get to be considered for appointment as a judge.

We have heard a certain amount about the GRECO report. It recommended that "the current system for selection, recruitment, promotion and transfers of judges be reviewed with a view to target the appointments to the most qualified and suitable candidates in a transparent way, without improper influence from executive/political powers". It refers to encouraging the Government to introduce reforms. I received its submission through the post, not from the Minister.

The report also states:

In addition to the information [directly] submitted by the Government, GRECO has also received information, directly submitted to it, by the judicial authorities, through the Chief Justice of Ireland, the President of the High Court and Acting President of the Court of Appeal, the President Designate of the Court of Appeal, the President of the Circuit Court and the President of the District Court concerning Recommendation vii. In their submission they stress that the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017 has not been subject to in-depth consultations with the judiciary (contrary to what is stated by the Government).

I would like to get the Minister's view on this. The GRECO report clearly and explicitly states that what the Government has said, which has been repeated in this House, about there having been extensive consultation with the judges is simply not true. The Judiciary has consistently opposed the content of the Bill, the components of which it believes are inconsistent with European standards. The GRECO authorities find themselves in agreement with these judges.

I will not read all the report into the record. Is the Minister inquiring about the relevant page? It is page 7.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.