Kevin Humphreys (Labour) | Oireachtas source

There are a few reserve functions for councillors. They have a reserve function in relation to the estimates or the budget and to the sale of land and property. They also have a reserve function in relation to the development plan.

Observations on planning are normally made on the development plan. I do not think I have ever made an observation on planning unless it was in some way related to the development plan.

The Minister of State stated that the councillors would be put under additional work. The primary role of a councillor, under those three functions, is the development plan and to ensure there is proper planning, whether in the county, city or wherever. The development plan should be a primary function of councillors. For starters, I do not think councillors come under pressure. That relates to old times where there was a few bob for planning permission given. The standard and quality of councillors shows leadership. They know exactly what needs to be developed and are quite confident and capable of saying: "No, I believe in the development plan that I voted on and I want to see it developed."

I note amendment No. 43 makes reference to the local area, but the local area has a greater impact in the development of a county or city. If one is running a metro line from Swords to Sandyford, the implications of density all along that line affect the financial viability of that line and it is nonsense to say one would exclude a councillor from the north side of the city from making a submission on density and height. I do not accept that.

Regulation can be changed and that is why I will press the matter of it being put in primary legislation to a vote here today.I accept the Minister of State's credibility and record but he may not be in office next year or in five or ten years' time. If this measure goes into primary legislation, it will have to come before both Houses to change it. Therefore, I intend to press my amendment.