Seanad debates

Thursday, 21 January 2016

10:30 am

Photo of Feargal QuinnFeargal Quinn (Independent) | Oireachtas source

I second Senator Norris's motion. Truthfully, every time I read "without debate", I shiver. What are we doing here if we are going to have things without debate? I can understand the need for it sometimes when certain regulations are coming through. However, in this case it is a motion on the report of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges on the amendment of Standing Orders 90 and 105 and the adoption of new Standing Orders 108A to 108E, inclusive, and a Schedule to Standing Orders.That seems to relate to this House and is the sort of issue that we should be debating. I urge the Deputy Leader to accept Senator Norris's proposal that we debate it today.

One of our concerns down the years has been the length of time that it takes for regulations to be implemented on legislation that we pass. The Seanad passed the Construction Contracts Act 2013 just ten hours before the new Government took office five years ago. Although I will not say that nothing has happened, the Act has not been commenced since then. Yesterday, I learned that it would be commenced within the coming months. At least we are getting somewhere with it, but I cannot get over how long it takes to get things done.

I wish to address Senator Daly's concerns about rural Ireland and Senator Mullins's reference to post offices. There are measures that we can take to ensure that rural Ireland survives. Not all of them will cost money, but some will. If rural Ireland is to survive and thrive in the years ahead, we must do something. We have the answer.

I wish to raise an issue that I mentioned previously. It concerns legislation that is being introduced across Europe to tackle ISIS killers who are returning to Europe after slaughtering people in Syria. They were welcomed into a number of countries, but most European nations have now introduced legislation to ensure that judges can debar such persons and remove their citizenships. We do not have that ability, but we should. Austria and Italy have strong legislation. If we are not careful, we will almost end up welcoming people who are returning to, or coming to, Europe having killed for ISIS. We can do something about this. We should at least give judges the right to remove people's passports, which we have been generous with in the past.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.