David Cullinane (Sinn Fein) | Oireachtas source

I move amendment No. 8:

In page 7, line 31, to delete "6 months" and substitute "12 months".

I did not want to come in on the last number of amendments or the section because the Senators who spoke made the points I would have made, so I did not feel the need to prolong the debate. However, I do want to pick up on something the Minister said in the last part of his contribution. There is no doubt that this Bill is a huge step forward. Regardless of the amendments that have been tabled, which have sought to strengthen the Bill, the Minister has given a very clear explanation as to why he could not amend some of them. Even if we are not entirely happy, there is no doubt it comes from the right position. We will certainly be in a much stronger position to make sure that all children in State control will get the proper and adequate supports regardless of whether they are in State care or leave. This Bill definitely goes in the right direction.

The aim of this amendment, which is the only one that was not ruled out of order, is to compel Tusla to draw up a comprehensive aftercare plan at least 12 months before the young person reaches the age of 18 rather than six months. It means that it can start planning far earlier for the eventuality and make sure that the plan is comprehensive and tailored to suit the needs of that individual. We think 12 months would be more suitable than the six-month period.