Seanad debates

Tuesday, 11 March 2014

General Scheme of the Seanad Electoral (University Members) (Amendment) Bill 2014: Statements

 

4:30 pm

Photo of Sean BarrettSean Barrett (Independent) | Oireachtas source

He had nothing to say before. He is now to seek revenge on the Independents, the five of us who defeated five political parties, namely, Fine Gael, the Labour Party, People Before Profit, Sinn Féin and the United Left Alliance. That was a major achievement. Why did we succeed in that? It was because we provide the vital checks and balances and, strictly, that is what a second Chamber does. That is what the Government is trying to eliminate. I have from the European Economic Review of 2010 an article stating, "we show that bicameralism improves the accountability of legislators in the electorate where the same party controls the two chambers". That is what the Government is trying to do away with.

I have tabled 328 amendments. Nobody will move such amendments when the political parties take over the seats because we will not have the money or resources to canvass 800,000 people. That is what the Minister is at; it is still the same power grab. The checks and balances that are so vital cannot be in place if this scheme is implemented. We must oppose the monopoly of ideas, which is what bicameralism is designed to correct.

The whipping record in this House is appalling. The Government whips people time and again. If we do not move the amendments, it never will. The procedure will be in secret such that an effort will be made to persuade the Minister at party meetings.

That is not good enough in the type of democracy we need so badly in this country.

The filling of casual vacancies under head 8 is the abuse practised in the European elections and we referred to it recently.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.