Seanad debates

Thursday, 4 October 2012

Ombudsman (Amendment) Bill 2008: Committee Stage

 

12:40 pm

Photo of Brendan HowlinBrendan Howlin (Wexford, Labour) | Oireachtas source

If one wants to argue for a further expansion, an acknowledgement of how far we are travelling would be helpful. Of course, the Ombudsman has a view about her remit. Every agency set up by law will have a view that it should have greater powers. I am sure the Seanad has views about itself but ultimately it is a matter for the Government in respect of legislation to make a proposition to the House, in consultation with the Minister for Justice and Equality. I have outlined his views. I am minded to accept his views and recommendations and they are the considered views of the Government.

In essence, it is the Government, by and largem, that proposes legislation, individual Members can do that as well, and it is for the House to consider it. External bodies have views on it. In this case, the view of the Ombudsman is extremely important but it is for the Government to make decisions. I am minded to accept the recommendations in this instance. I understand the argument and the logic which I share with Senator Ó Clochartaigh. However, if a new regime is to be put in place, let us look at the legislation - we are waiting a long time for it - in terms of the immigration and naturalisation service and general legislation on immigration matters and also in responding to reports from the prisons' inspector, a complaints regime that is immediate and timely for the Irish Prison Service. If there is a judgment call subsequently that we need to visit, I have indicated to the House that Senators will find I have an open ear on that matter. I ask Members to give us the space to put in place what the Minister for justice intends.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.