Ivana Bacik (Independent) | Oireachtas source

I welcome the Minister to the House and the introduction of this Bill. As with all Members, I am grateful to the Minister for setting out the genesis of the Bill and the fact it was previously introduced in the Dáil under the previous Government. However, I understand it is the first time the Bill has been in this House. I am delighted we have the opportunity to speak on it now, essentially in a new period of its history. The Minister has outlined very clearly the proposals for amendment on Committee Stage.

Although the Bill was initiated under a previous Government, it clearly fits in with the current Government's political reform agenda. It covers a number of different principles, including that of strengthening accountability of public bodies and improving the quality of services to the public. The latter is an important aspect, as the Minister stated. As Senator Keane emphasised, it is important in enhancing the transparency of public administration. The Bill comprises a positive set of measures to empower citizens and improve public services.

Like previous speakers, I pay tribute to the existing Ombudsman, Ms Emily O'Reilly, who has done a superb job and who is now halfway through her second term as Ombudsman. She has acquired a list of additional jobs and this Bill is adding to those.

With regard to Senator Keane's question on whether the Title should refer to "Ombudsman" or "Ombudswoman", I have grappled with the issue. I discovered literature suggesting the title "ombud" would be a useful compromise. It is non-gender specific and there is some backing for it, even in the Swedish language. Senator Harte pointed out to me that this is like a title used in Trinity College. Senator Barrett will be aware of fellows of the college. Women can be fellows, as can men.