Feargal Quinn (Independent) | Oireachtas source

Will the Leader consider a debate on the document issued yesterday by Senator Zappone, me and some former Senators, including Joe O'Toole, when people have had the chance to discuss it? It is a discussion document and, I hope, is non-controversial. I would like to think we could have a debate which would be non-controversial. When people have had the chance to read the document, I urge the Leader to have a debate in which there will be no vote. We can have statements rather than put down a motion which might perhaps embarrass those whose parties do not approve of it.

This is similar to what Senator van Turnhout said. It is a shame that every time a motion is put down, the Government feels obliged to table an amendment to it which contradicts the objectives of the motion. We should have a non-controversial and a non-divisive method of discussing items like that.

I agree entirely with what Senator Barrett said yesterday in regard to his concern about third level education and I was delighted to hear Senator Bacik refer to it today. There is much to discuss there. Senator Cullinane will be interested to see that one of the proposals is for a joint college of technology between Dublin and Waterford. It would appear there is much to debate in this area.

Let us try to ensure this House is not always controversial. We do not have controversies that often but let us ensure we can avoid them. A good discussion on third level education would be very welcome and from what I gather, the Minister, Deputy Quinn, would also welcome the opportunity to have that debate here.