Tony Mulcahy (Fine Gael)

I also refute the idea that other parties would not have done the same in similar circumstances. While there is a need to cut costs, on the one hand, there is also a need, on the other, to secure private funding from elsewhere and to put together programmes that will encourage philanthropy from new avenues. As the Minister outlined, we have seen great success, with the National Archives managing to secure €250,000 for a particular project. I would like to see more of this. It is my sincere belief that if we present compelling propositions, we will see the private sector step in to support the great institutions. However, no matter what are the recommendations of the report or what way a programme of savings is put together, the Minister has delivered one message loud and clear, namely, that curatorial independence will remain, that there will be no orders from the Department that a particular exhibit must be purchased or that a specific selection of books must be put on display. I share the Minister's intention that at the end of the process the cultural institutions will emerge stronger and be able to weather any storm.

It can be easy to forget about all things other than numbers and to view the world through the prism of a balance sheet. To do so is both short-sighted and unwise and in that sense, I am heartened to see that the Minister has taken such a balanced approach and worked so hard to engage with all stakeholders throughout the process. Nevertheless, while I ultimately admire the thrust of the motion proposed, for the reasons outlined, I must support the counter-motion.