Averil Power (Fianna Fail)

Priory Hall residents never had a desire to become experts on building regulations, but, having been to hell and back in the last few years and studied and traced how these fire traps - their apartments - were allowed to be built in the first place, they have gained huge expertise. Apart from wanting to see their current problems solved, they are determined to do what they can to highlight the need for the regulations to be changed to prevent other families from ending up in a similar position. They have read the draft building control (amendment) regulations published by the Department and the chairman of the residents' group, Mr. Graham Usher, has contacted me and also written to the Minister about them. In tabling this matter for discussion on the Adjournment I sent the Minister a copy of the email I had received from Mr. Usher who raises serious concerns about the draft regulations. In his view, the Department has not learned the lessons of Priory Hall. I wish to state these concerns and hear the Minister's response to them.

Mr. Usher argues that the proposed amendments still focus on local authorities accepting and filing certificates of compliance. He points out that the relevant certificates for Priory Hall were filed and that this failed to prevent the problems from occurring. Under the 1990 Act, local authorities have the power to inspect works in progress. Clearly, they have not availed of it. It is the view of the residents that legislation should be used to turn this power into a statutory duty. In the past local authorities claimed they did not have the resources to carry out inspections of new developments, despite receiving huge amounts in development levies from residents. The levies in respect of Priory Hall came to huge amounts for a building in which the local authority failed to carry out its functions properly.

It is never acceptable for a building to be built without being properly inspected, or for a fire safety certificate to be issued before a brick has been laid, as happened in the case of Priory Hall, but that excuse should not stand up today, given the far lower level of development taking place and the availability of personnel to carry out inspections. I call on the Minister to ensure that under the new regulations, all buildings will be inspected and that if financial arrangements must be made to cover the cost, this will be done. The least families deserve after paying so much for their homes, particularly to the State in the form of stamp duty and levies, is that the building has been properly inspected to ensure it is safe.

Mr. Usher argues that if a decision is taken not to inspect all developments, at the very least, a targeted approach should taken, rather than maintaining the current system that appears to be random in nature. The decision to inspect should take into account the past history of the developer and any other available information that indicates there may be potential problems with a development. This would necessitate the sharing of information between 37 local authorities and any other State body involved in the construction process, possibly through having a centralised database, in order that the information available in one local authority would be available to all others. If such a system had been in place, it would have flagged the fact that the developer of Priory Hall had had problems with other developments. We saw how Ms Theresa McGuinness, a victim in one of McFeely's developments in County Louth, had to chase him over to London. It would also have flagged the fact that the Health and Safety Authority in 2006 had sought a High Court order to close the Priory Hall development owing to safety concerns. All of this information should have been flagged in making sure the local authority did its job and inspected the site. It seems, however, to the Priory Hall residents that the regulations still do not include a requirement on local authorities as the relevant fire safety authority to ensure compliance with the fire safety standards. Given that the Chief Fire Officer for Dublin City Council has stated a fire could spread throughout the entire Priory Hall development within minutes owing to an absence of fire protection measures, it is a source of huge concern that a more proactive approach to fire safety does not seem to be central the draft regulations.

There is a chance to engage in a root and branch review of the current system. That is certainly the purpose behind the Minister's exercise. It is important, however, to ensure all the relevant safeguards are in place and that we do not opt for a stop-gap half measure. It is time to get it right in this area and ensure families can, at least, be assured their properties will be safe.