Seanad debates

Wednesday, 23 May 2012

Passenger Name Records: Motion

 

12:00 pm

Photo of Ivana BacikIvana Bacik (Independent)

It had been referred to the Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality, which is the normal procedure. We had a full debate at the committee, in which I participated, and I am delighted that we are having a further debate in the House. The committee scrutinised the motion closely and, as the Minister will recall, I raised two issues with him. This is about ensuring a balance is struck between the right of citizens to travel freely without fear of harm or terrorist attack and their right not to experience undue interference with their privacy while travelling. The disclosure and exchange of information by airlines are the key issues. I raised two issues to ensure the appropriate balance was struck. I asked the Minister whether he was satisfied there would be sufficient oversight and a review of the exchange of data to ensure the balance was maintained. I received a good and fair response on the regular review provided for in the framework decision by the EU and US authorities, which was reassuring.

My second question related to a query raised by Senator David Norris. It would be relatively rare in the exchange of passenger name records to disclose sensitive data. The Senator referred to the exchange of these data and disclosing somebody's religious beliefs or ethnic origin or sexual orientation.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.