Seanad debates

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

1:00 pm

Photo of Feargal QuinnFeargal Quinn (Independent)

I seldom support Sinn Féin but I support Senator Cullinane's call for a debate on the stability treaty. Every time people who advocate a "No" vote in the referendum opens their mouths, they lose support. There is no case whatsoever to be made for a "No" vote. The fact that four Members believe they should vote "No" means it would be worthwhile to have a debate. We probably should have one every week for the next three weeks. The vote is three weeks tomorrow but we have not had enough discussion on it. There was an interesting meeting earlier attended by 200 people representing business in Ireland. The Taoiseach, the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation and a few others made the case for a "Yes" vote. The basic case is that the reputation of Ireland has been enhanced over the past six months. Ireland was highly regarded five or six years ago. Three years ago, the State was a huge worry for everyone in Europe but over the past weekend leading European voices said they hoped and assumed Ireland would vote "Yes" because there is so much at stake. It would be worthwhile to have a debate on the treaty if only to hear those opposed to it argue their case for voting "No" because they will lose the case strongly.

Senator Moloney called for sign language to be included in the school curriculum. I have experience of arranging sign language classes. It is something people can adapt to quickly and it supports many of those who do not have good hearing.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.