Feargal Quinn (Independent)

This was a particular concern of the unions. The Minister and his officials have listened to their concerns. Neither do I believe it poses any threat to employers. I can understand in the case of a person who works for a year, is gone for a month, returns to work for another year and is gone again for another month, that on his or her next return for the third assignment, the person is deemed to have had two years service and is not treated as starting on a day one basis. It makes sense and does not threaten potential employment opportunities while removing the concern the unions had. I certainly support this amendment.