Seanad debates

Thursday, 29 March 2012

10:30 am

Photo of Paul BradfordPaul Bradford (Fine Gael)

I note the contribution from the Senator. It is interesting that the other House is dealing with the excess of planning permissions and the problems that stem therefrom. His comments about what could be described as serial objectors is worthy of consideration. In respect of his point and the matter being debated in the other House there is a need for a substantial debate on the broader planning concepts and how the mix of planning and politics, objections, support and so on can be regulated. That could be a debate for the next few months.

I agree with Senator Fidelma Healy Eames in respect of the group to which she referred. Although there are a number of ideas before the Seanad Public Consultation Committee it is a matter that is worthy of consideration.

Senator Sean Barrett raised a pertinent matter concerning taxation in general. We have had a number of commissions on taxation, all of which have done sterling work. Like many reports on all topics they generally rest wearily and easily in the Oireachtas Library and in various museum type places. We need a broad debate on taxation and the forms of taxation which will have to be introduced in the coming years. Perhaps the Oireachtas is the best place for such a debate. The Members of this and the other House should be the members of any commission on taxation. It is unrealistic to expect that no new forms of taxation will be introduced but the plea must be to ensure they are fair and representative. The debate could be kick started here in the coming months on the necessary reforms. I ask the Leader to consider such a debate as we all know it is necessary.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.