Seanad debates

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

1:00 pm

Photo of David NorrisDavid Norris (Independent)

The Leader played a significant and constructive role on the debates on the defamation legislation. He will recall that the Government at that stage promised to introduce a privacy Bill to balance out the Defamation Bill. I am glad to note the Privacy Bill 2006 is No. 12 on the Order Paper. In light of the previous debates in which both the Leader and I took part, will the Leader inform the House when the Bill will be moved? Having recently reread the legislation, it is in general well drafted and well considered. I would welcome its passing by this House and the other House. If it is helpful, I would be pleased to add my name to the legislation and, if the Government wishes, to move that we make time available next Tuesday to start the process.

I am all in favour of a free press and media that are capable of proper investigative journalism. On the subject of journalism, I am reliably informed by my distinguished academic colleague, Senator Barrett, that the ratings agencies are just another form of journalism. I wonder if we cannot do something about them as well, as I have been asking for the past three or four years. They are causing mayhem across international stock exchanges today by presuming, as a group of journalists - a form of low critic as far as I can see - to de-rate most of the European Union. I wonder if it is tolerable that a private institution of economic journalists should be permitted to do such damage without being held to account, particularly in light of the agencies' highly sinister history.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.