Seanad debates

Thursday, 1 December 2011

11:00 am

Photo of Rónán MullenRónán Mullen (Independent)

I support Senator Bacik's remarks in terms of the debates for which she called in the new year. It is important we are provided with an opportunity to scrutinise legislation to the maximum extent possible and that we have an opportunity to discuss issues before legislation comes before us.

Like Senator Bacik, I found yesterday's engagement with the various bodies that appeared before the Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality very interesting. Many issues which we should be discussing in this Chamber were highlighted during that meeting. I would also like time to be provided for a debate on the findings of the church audits. Most Members would agree when I say that Mr. Ian Elliott deserves particular credit for the manner in which he carried out his work. I find the tone of this audit truthful and satisfactory, as compared with previous reports. While I do not wish to be critical of those reports, the language used in the audit shows the wrongs of the past in terms of the manner in which cases were handled, for which there must be consequences, while at the same time recognising good practice.

The difference this time is perhaps media reception of the issue thus far, which has been positive. While everything has been ventilated, the approach has been measured and considered. It is hoped that will continue because it will be to the good of best practice in the area of child protection. There is bad and good news in the audit but I look forward to the church helping to provide a model of best practice which can be picked up on by other groups in our society. Despite the progress made, the bad and sad news is that this problem is not going to go away. We need to step up our engagement on this issue across all levels of society. This House should play a particular role in that examination.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.