Feargal Quinn (Independent)

Last night Sir Richard Branson called on the British Government to introduce legislation for organ donation with an opt-out clause. A Bill was introduced in this House three years ago which had a very good debate on Second Stage. Then I was asked whether I would adjourn it with two or three minutes to go so that consultation could take place in regard to the opt-out. It was not just an opt-out; it was an opt-out with co-ordinators in each hospital to encourage organ donation. Nothing has happened and the Bill fell with the change of Government. I wish to know whether we should consider introducing the same or a similar Bill again. Perhaps the Leader would find out the view of the Government on the matter. I mention it because a large number of people are waiting for organ donations. Let us consider the success when somebody donates an organ, in particular when an accident occurs and a family says it is happy to have the family member's organs donated. I have read of people who have said that they feel so good because, for example, the death of their son has at least given somebody the right to see, or to have a kidney or liver transplant. We can do that with an opt-out clause that is well advertised. If anyone does not want his or her body to be used to help someone else then he or she can opt out.

I recall a lovely quote: "Do not send your organs to heaven; we need them here on earth." We do need them here on earth but for those who are concerned about an opt-out clause which says that if one does not opt out then one can assume that one's body parts will be used, I assure them they will not be used without the consent of the family. That can all be covered. It is time we considered the matter again. The British are now following what we attempted to do. We should lead the way once again. It is worthwhile confirming with the Minister for Health whether he would support the reintroduction of a similar Bill to that which was introduced three years ago.