Seanad debates

Friday, 8 July 2011

Defence (Amendment) Bill 2011: Report and Final Stages

 

1:00 pm

Photo of Rónán MullenRónán Mullen (Independent)

I acknowledge that. Some would say that his elegant imprecision would leave him not under qualified for a job in that area on occasions. The substance of my amendments comes down to two things. I have no problem with the reduction from ten years to eight in the eligible term required for an appointment as military judge or director of military prosecutions. I contend that it would be no problem at all were people with that level of experience to be included and I have no problem accepting that certain people would be the beneficiaries of that. I stand over it in the context of my wider satisfaction at the opening up of eligibility to all barristers and solicitors within ten years. What the Minister and I would both achieve from what is proposed, whether he prevails or I do - although there is no doubt about who will prevail - is a wide pool of potential applicants.

It comes down to a question of transparency. I ask the Minister to say on the record whether he is happy that he was fully and properly briefed on all the relevant background.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.